APPEASEMENT IS SURRENDER ON THE INSTALLMENT PLAN: Geert Wilders, Dutch politician and producer of the controversial film, FITNA, arrested and banned from entry into Great Britain.

Wilders labelled Gordon Brown the biggest coward in Europe. Due to him being recommended not to come to the UK on 12/2/09 Wilders carried out his plan to enter the UK but was refused entrance at immigration and now has been put under a 3 year ban from coming to the UK.

Free speech is dead in the UK if you’re indigenous or a white visitor and go against the liberal system.

It was claimed the visit and his screening of his film FITNA would cause society unrest (ie muslims would hold violent riotous protests!) The screening of the film actually took place still in The House of Commons so the ban on Wilders entrance was obviously a personel attack on himself and nothing really to do with his film screening!


I’m surprised Gordon Brown didn’t have one of his ‘oh so offended’ Muslim terrorist-sympathizer buddies chop off his head.

Related links: 




Melanie Philips:  How Britain, the cradle of liberty, is sleepwalking towards cultural suicide.

If anyone had doubted the extent to which Britain has capitulated to Islamic terror, the banning of Geert Wilders should surely open their eyes. A letter from the Home Secretary’s office to Wilders, delivered via the British embassy in the Hague, said: ‘…the Secretary of State is of the view that your presence in the UK would pose a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society.


So let’s get this straight. The British government allows people to march through British streets screaming support for Hamas, it allows Hizb ut Tahrir to recruit on campus for the jihad against Britain and the west, it takes no action against a Muslim peer who threatens mass intimidation of Parliament, but it bans from the country a member of parliament of a European democracy who wishes to address the British Parliament on the threat to life and liberty in the west from religious fascism.

It is he, not them, who is considered a ‘serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society’. Why? Because the result of this stand for life and liberty against those who would destroy them might be an attack by violent thugs.

The response is not to face down such a threat of violence but to capitulate to it instead.

A Dutch politician who doesn’t threaten anyone is banned for telling unpalatable truths about those who do; while those who threaten life and liberty find that the more they do so, the more the British government will do exactly what they want, in the interests of ‘community harmony’.

If British MPs do not raise hell about this banning order, if they go along with this spinelessness, if they fail to stand up for the principle that the British Parliament of all places must be free to hear what a fellow democratically elected politician has to say about one of the most difficult and urgent issues of our time, if they fail to hold the line against the threat of violence but capitulate to it instead, they will be signalling that Britain is no longer the cradle of freedom and democracy but its graveyard.



RELATED VIDEOS: islamic-britain