Nearly eight years after the Sept. 11 attacks, the FBI’s terrorist watch list is so flawed that at least 10 people who should have been kept out of the United States were allowed to cross its borders.

Get a clue guys, start with the people who look like this and have names like these:

Department of Justice Inspector General Glenn A. Fine concluded that the bureau also was slow to remove names that should not have been on the list, leading to outcries from civil libertarians who have long been critical.

The list also audited more than 65,000 names and concluded that more than one-third were outdated. The whole list includes 1.1 million names, though aliases and variant spellings mean these represent fewer people.

“That the FBI continues to fail to place subjects of terrorism investigations on the watch list is unacceptable,” said Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont Democrat and chairman of the Judiciary Committee, which has oversight of the FBI.

“Disturbingly, today’s report reveals that in 72 percent of the cases, the FBI has also failed to remove subjects from the list in a timely manner. … Given the very real and negative consequences to which people on the watch list are subjected, this is unacceptable.


Sometimes terrorists look like this
Sometimes terrorists look like this

Sen. Charles E. Grassley, Iowa Republican and a Judiciary member, said the report “just shows more of the same with the FBI. Shoddy and lackadaisical record keeping with the terrorist watch list increases the risk that terrorists can enter the United States freely. It’s a risk we can’t afford.”

The results of the audit came from an analysis of 216 terrorism cases from 2006 to the first half of 2008. The report said that the subjects of terrorism investigations, even those in the earliest stages, generally are put on the list.

The inspector general’s investigation found that the terrorism suspect was never added to the list in 15 percent of the cases analyzed, amounting to the FBI’s failure to add a total of 35 names. At least three people with names matching those of terrorism suspects who should have been on the list subsequently entered the U.S., the inspector general said.

“We believe that the FBI’s failure to consistently nominate subjects of international and domestic terrorism investigations to the terrorist watch list could pose a risk to national security,” the report stated. “The failure to nominate terrorism subjects can also lead to missed opportunities in gathering important intelligence, and it can place front-line law enforcement and screening personnel at increased risk.”

The investigation also concluded that the bureau frequently was slow to add names to the list – in 78 percent of cases, it took more than the bureau’s goal of 20 days. On average, it took 42 days to add a name to the list.

Nine people attempted to cross the border before their names were put on the list, after the 20-day standard. The audit is not comprehensive and does not indicate whether every attempt was successful. It only specifies one as unsuccessful.

It is unknown whether any of any of the people whose names matched those that should have been on the list were terrorism suspects. The report doesn’t say whether any of them ran afoul of the law while in the U.S.ions to improve the list.

“These measures have included developing a metrics team to monitor compliance on an ongoing basis, increasing training on watch-listing practices, requiring quarterly supervisory review, improving the accuracy and completeness of nominations, reconfiguring resources to maximize timeliness, and requesting corrections for all nominations inaccurately attributed to the FBI,” Assistant Director John Miller said in a statement. “We remain committed to improving our watch-list policy and practices to ensure the proper balance between national security protection and the need for accurate, efficient and streamlined watch-listing processes.”  WASHINGTON TIMES

Apparently it’s even harder to get off a terrorist watch list if you’re not a terrorist than to get on one if you are.


Of course over at the far left HUFFPO blog, they have their panties in a wad because as they claim, “Muslims Disproportionate Victims of Flawed Terrorist List.”

An April 2009 report titled, Unreasonable Intrusions: Investigating the Politics, Faith & Finances of Americans Returning Home shows, “that U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) Customs & Border Protection (“CBP”) agents have systematically questioned individuals about their political beliefs, religious practices, and charities they support. Questions include “What is your religion?,” “What mosque do you attend?,” “What do you think of the war in Iraq?,” and “What charities do you contribute to?” Agents have also sought to review and copy business cards, credit cards, and data on laptops, digital cameras and cell phones. These interrogations and searches — which appear to be targeting Muslims or those perceived to be Muslim — are taking place without evidence that the travelers have engaged in wrongdoing.”

Eight years into the so called war on terror, profiling of Muslims remains quite in vogue. Prejudices against Muslims remain real and progressively worsening. A recent ABC News/Post Poll finds that “Americans by 48-41 percent hold an unfavorable opinion of Islam — its highest unfavorable rating in ABC/Post polls since 2001. And 29 percent express the belief that mainstream Islam encourages violence against non-Muslims — down slightly from its peak, but double what it was early in 2002.”  HUFFINGTON POST

(I don’t see anything wrong with that.)


RELATED VIDEOS:EnemyWithin-American