Jun 28 2010
*TRAYF – Traditionally, anything that is considered vile and non-kosher in the Jewish faith. Contemporarily, something dirty and nasty that you don’t want around, much less want to consume or touch. (pig, scum, dirt, feces, filth, skank)
The Rabbinical Alliance of America, which represents 850 Orthodox Rabbis, harshly criticized U.S. President Barack Obama’s nominee for the Supreme Court, Elena Kagan. Kagan, 50, is set to replace retiring Justice John Paul Stevens, 90, the court’s foremost liberal.
“Ms. Kagan is Non-Kosher (trayf) – not fit to serve on the supreme court or any other court. It is clear from Ms. Kagan’s record on issues such as abortion-on-demand, Partial-Birth-Abortion, the radical homosexual and lesbian agenda, the “supremacy” of the anti-family panoply over religious liberties of Biblical adherents, et. al., that she will function as a flame-throwing radical, hastening society’s already steep decline into Sodom and Gommorah.”
Not to mention her pro-Shari’a Law position: supreme-court-nominee-elena-kagan-supported-sharia-islamic-law-at-harvard-but-not-the-u-s-military
Levin told CNSNews.com that his fellow rabbis and hundreds of thousands of Orthodox Jews–are confused at the Obama’s choice of Kagan. “What exactly was Obama thinking, President Obama thinking, when he nominated Kagan? Because eventually, down the road, someone–or some group–is going to ‘take the hit’ for the crazy decisions that Kagan is bound to make. So we would have much preferred if President Obama had given this ‘distinction’ to another minority group, instead of singling out the Jews.”
“We feel that Elena Kagan turns traditional Judaism on its head–from a concept of a nation of priests and holy people, she is turning it into, ‘Let’s homosexualize every segment of society. And by the way, partial-birth babies have no right to be delivered.’” Israel National News
Ironically, Kagan could be under fire for idolizing a far-left Israeli judge who believed that the judicial branch should trump all other branches of government.
In 2006, Kagan, who was at the time dean of Harvard Law School, introduced former Israeli Chief Justice Aharon Barak at a school function as “my judicial hero.” She went on to say that for her, Barak represented exactly what the judiciary should and could become.
Former US Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork said that Barak “may be the worst judge on the planet,” and Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said that Kagan’s idolizing of him “might provide real insight into her approach to the law.”
Barak was controversial during his time as president of Israel’s High Court of Justice, and became even more so when he stepped down in 2006. Barak held firmly to a belief that the judicial branch should trump all other branches of government, and be extremely activist, rather than simply acting as a stabilizer. Right-leaning Israelis who were constantly at the mercy of Barak’s left-leaning views can attest to the near-tyrranical situation that resulted. Israel Today
Kagan argued before the Supreme Court: “Its fine if the law bans books because Government won’t really enforce it.”
No it won’t, at least not until Obama has his gestapo officers in place.