A mosque by any other name would smell as bad

Cordoba House Mosque near Ground Zero slaps a new name on itself – ‘Park51’

In a thinly veiled attempt to distance itself  from the name Cordoba, the symbol for Islam’s conquest of Spain and the slaughter of non-Muslims, developers of the Ground Zero mosque are trying to obfuscate what this building represents – the destruction of Islam’s enemies and the building of mosques on their important sites.

Developers behind the controversial 13-story Islamic community center and Mega Mosque near Ground Zero announced a bland new name for the project. Spokesman Oz Sultan said the new name puts emphasis on the community center aspect of the project rather than religion. (HAH!)

The name was derived from the address of the planned new building, 51 Park Place. But the new moniker did little to quell an angry crowd of nearly 100, who turned a Landmarks Preservation Commission hearing yesterday into a turf war over the project.

Up for debate was the architectural and historical significance of the existing building, which developers hope to replace with a 13-story community center and Islamic prayer space.

But the public testimony quickly dissolved into racially charged tirades against the project, with supporters accusing their detractors of “Islamophobia.” “People were murdered on 9/11 because the terrorists believed in the power of Islam,” said Sierra Rose, 19, of Manhattan. “Anybody who is an American knows what caused those people to attack us on 9/11 was their religion,” Rose added.

Scott Caruthers, a 9/11 first responder, said the current building’s proximity to Ground Zero makes it worthy of protection. Landmark designation would prohibit developers of the project from demolishing the existing building. “This structure is of historical significance, not just to this city, but to the country as a whole, and indeed to the rest of the free world fighting the cancer of religious extremism,” said Caruthers, 37.

Project developer Sharif el-Gamal testified the 152-year-old commercial building simply doesn’t deserve protection. “This is not the Woolworth Building. This is not the Chrysler Building. This building does not warrant individual landmark status,” he said.

Commissioners will debate the matter in private, then vote on whether to proceed or remove it from consideration at a public meeting later this summer.

Gamal said the vitriol at yesterday’s hearing showed the urgent need for an Islamic center in New York City.

NY DAILY NEWS

Share