Former British Muslim extremist slams Obama for sending US Ambassador to the most radical mosque in London

SHIRAZ MAHER, ex-member of radical Islamist group, Hizb ut Tahrir, cannot understand why Barack Hussein Obama sent his Ambassador to the UK to visit the East London Mosque, one of Britain’s most extreme Islamic institutions.

(Well, we know why, but let’s here what Maher has to say from a Muslim perspective)

Original story: u-s-ambassador-bows-down-to-the-most-radical-mosque-in-london

Standing Point Built with financial aid from Saudi Arabia, the East London Mosque (ELM) is home to the London Muslim Center where incendiary preachers are regularly welcomed. On Monday, the East London Mosque hosted a very different kind of visitor-the U.S. ambassador to the United Kingdom, Louis Susman. Urged by President Barack Obama to engage with British Muslims, Mr. Susman spoke of his “great admiration” for the mosque and his enthusiasm for meeting its staff.

By any measure the East London mosque is a troubling institution. Last year, for example, it hosted an event titled “The End of Time: A New Beginning,” where pamphlets were distributed showing Manhattan crumbling under a Hadean apocalypse of meteors, which shattered the Statute of Liberty asunder and set the city ablaze. One of the invited speakers, Khalid Yasin, described the beliefs of Christians and Jews as “filth.” Most worryingly, the event also featured a live video question-and-answer session with Anwar Al Awlaki, the U.S.-born preacher aligned with al Qaeda. (And currently the only person on Obama’s shoot-to-kill list)

Awlaki’s terrorist credentials rival those of Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri. Two of the 9/11 terrorists as well as Major Nidal Hasan, who murdered 13 U.S. soldiers in Fort Hood last year, attended his sermons in Washington. From his new base in Yemen, Awlaki called Major Hasan a “hero” and boasted of having directed the “underpants bomber,” Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, in his bid to blow up a Delta airlines flight last Christmas.

Mr. Susman’s visit illustrates the blunders Western politicians often make by reaching out to the wrong Muslim “dialogue partners.” The U.S. ambassador could have easily found out about the mosque’s sympathies for reactionary Islamism by consulting the British government. A report published last year by the Department for Communities and Local Government on the Pakistani Muslim community in England states that “the East London Mosque [is] the key institution for the Bangladeshi wing of JI [Jamaat-e Islami] in the U.K.” Jamaat-e Islami is the radical South Asian party created by Syed Abulala Maududi, which aims to create an Islamist theocracy.

None of this should come as a surprise to Mr. Susman. Congressional reports from as far back as 1993 have warned of Jamaat’s links to terrorism, particularly in Kashmir.

Ironically, two years ago Jamaat was virtually eliminated as a political force in Bangladesh, winning just two out of 300 seats. By contrast, their allies in Britain still claim to speak for British Muslims while their “mother party” has been decisively rejected at the ballot box.

In contrast to the determination of the Bangladeshi people to reject extremist politics, Mr. Susman has emboldened their British counterparts. This visit comes as a bitter blow to those secular and genuinely progressive Muslims in East London who have been pushing back against the mosque’s extremism. Mr. Susman’s visit to the East London Mosque emboldened robed reactionaries at the expense of their more moderate counterparts.

The repercussions of the ambassador’s decision to attend and praise the East London Mosque are already reverberating through Westminster. Prime Minister David Cameron has asked Lord Carlile, the government’s independent reviewer of anti-terrorism laws, to oversee an exhaustive review of its “Preventing Violent Extremism” program, including the manner in which communal partners are selected. There is no suggestion, however, that the British government recommended the East London Mosque to the Americans.

As Britain is slowly realizing that empowering Islamists-even if they claim to reject violence-is counterproductive, the U.S. ought to learn from those mistakes rather than repeat them.

Shiraz Maher on Muslim extremism: