‘SHARIA’ AUSTRIA: Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff found guilty of ‘Denigration of Religious Teachings’ for telling the truth about Islam

Freedom of speech no longer exists in Austria, as definitively proven by the Vienna high court. This week, a judge upheld the conviction against Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff on the following charge: “denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognized religion.” In simplest terms, this means that in Austria, as in other nations across the Western world currently transitioning to Sharia (Islamic law), speaking the truth about Islam is not tolerated, and, more and more, is against the law.

WND (H/T Maria)  Elisabeth was convicted in February 2011 of “denigration” of Islam because in the course of a seminar she was teaching on Islam she stated that “Muhammad had a thing for little girls.”

This statement is demonstrably true. According to an authoritative Islamic text (hadith), Muhammad married his wife, Aisha, when she was six years old. According to the same hadith, Muhammad engaged in sexual intercourse with his “wife” when she was nine. This, at the very least, constitutes “a thing” for little girls. It also constitutes child rape under Western law and Judeo-Christian-derived morality. In all too many Islamic societies where Muhammad’s example is emulated, such child rape in “wedlock” is not a crime; indeed, it is permissible under Sharia.

In fact, the court didn’t contest this. In both Elisabeth’s initial trial and her recent appeal, the factual basis of her statement didn’t come under judicial attack. Elisabeth is right, and the court knows it. What the Vienna court has twice defined now as being outside the law of Austria is the negative opinion her remark conveyed regarding Muhammad’s record of deviance from Western traditions forbidding sexual intercourse with children. It is wrong, according to the Austrian court, to look down on sex with children if the alleged perp, centuries ago, was the Islamic prophet.

 It is literally against Islamic law to criticize or expose Islam or its prophet (Muhammad) in any adverse way. This prohibition against freedom of conscience is now part of Austrian law as well. That the verdict upheld against Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff actually imperils the most innocent and vulnerable among us – little girls whose molestation the courts have implicitly excused as a religious rite – only underscores the depravity of the Vienna high court.

Share