Contrary to what sharia-proponents in America want you to believe…..

Sharia Law is totally incompatible with democracy, according to Sharia4Belgium’s Aby Imran.

The concept of democracy is alien to the Muslim psyche, to the extent that there is not even an equivalent terminology for it in Arabic, or in any language spoken Muslim countries. The next time a Muslim tells you that Islamic law is compatible with America’s Constitution, tell him to prove it.


14 comments on “Contrary to what sharia-proponents in America want you to believe…..

  1. Dajjal
    This exactly what I have been saying on the Constitution side. They Go hand in hand that mohommedism cannot live together with the Constitution of the United States of America.


  2. To the attention of all whose anus and brain are not juxtaposed: CRITICALLY IMPORTANT INFORMATION not available from alternative sources. Surah Al-Ahzab has a vital clue for you.

    33:36. It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error.

    Exactly what part of when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter do LibTurds not comprehend>? Autocracy Democracy!.

    Because Allah created the world, he is sovereign over the world, he alone having the right to rule, which he graciously bestowed upon Moe and his successors,. to the exclusion of all others.

    From Reliance of the Traveller, Book M, regarding issues of marriage & child custody, we learn that: a non-Muslim has no right to authority. The full context is included below with emphasis on the crucial clause.

    From Book O, regarding the caliphate, obviously extensible to all positions of rulership, we learn that: it being invalid to appoint a non-Muslim (kafir) to authority, even to rule non-Muslim. The full context is included below.


    The necessary conditions for a person to have custody of a child are:

    (a) uprightness (def: o24.4) (O: a corrupt person may not be a guardian, because child care is a position of authority, and the corrupt are unqualified for it. Mawardi and Ruyani hold that outward uprightness (def: m3.3(f) ) is sufficient unless there is open wrongdoing. If the corruptness of a child’s mother consists of her not performing the prayer (salat), she has no right to custody of the child, who might grow up to be like her, ending up in the same vile condition of not praying, for keeping another’s company has its effects);

    (b) sanity (O: since a mother uninterruptedly insane has no right to custody, though if her insanity is slight, such as a single day per year, her right to custody is not vitiated by it);

    (c) and if the child is Muslim, it is a necessary condition that the person with custody be a Muslim

    (O: because it is a position of authority, and a non-Muslim has no right to authority and hence no right to raise a Muslim. If a non-Muslim were given charge of the custody and upbringing of the child, the child might acquire the character traits of unbelief (kufr) ).

    O25.3: The Qualifications of a Caliph

    (Nawawi:) among the qualifications of the caliph are that he be:

    (a) Muslim (H: so that he may see to the best interests of Islam and the Muslims (K: it being invalid to appoint a non-Muslims (K: it being invalid to appoint a non-Muslim (kafir) to authority, even to rule non-Muslim.) (S: Qadi ‘lyad states that there is scholarly consensus (def: b7) that it is not legally valid to invest a non-Muslim as caliph, and that if a caliph becomes a non-Muslim (dis: 08.7) he is not longer caliph, as also when he does not maintain the prescribed prayers (A: meaning to both perform them himself and order Muslim to) and summon the people to them, and likewise (according to the majority of scholars) if he makes reprehensible innovations (bid’a, def: w29.3) (A: by imposing an innovation on people that is Offensive or unlawful). If the caliph becomes a non-Muslim, alters the Sacred Law- (N: such alteration being of two types, one of which consists of his changing the Law by legislating something which contravenes it while believing in the validity of the provisions of the Sacred Law, this being an injustice that does not permit rebellion against him, while the other consists of imposing rules that contravenes the provisions of the religion while believing in the validity of the rules he has imposed, this being unbelief (kufr) (A: it is questionable whether anyone would impose much rules without believing in their validity) ) – or imposes reprehensible innovations while in office, then he loses his authority and need no longer be obeyed, and it is obligatory for Muslims to rise against him if possible, remove him from office, and install an upright leader in his place. If only some are able, they are obliged to rise up and remove the unbeliever (A: whether they believe they will succeed or fail), through it is not obligatory to try to remove a leader who imposes reprehensible innovations unless they believe it possible. If they are certain that they are unable to (A: remove an innovator), they are not obliged to rise against him. Rather, a Muslim in such a case should emigrate from his country (N: if he can find a better one), fleeing with his religion (A: which is obligatory if he is prevented in his home country from openly performing acts of worship) ) );

  3. Well DUH! Thougt everyone knew that democracy and islam were at opposite ends!
    BTW: How about that obamanation insulting Israel and the UK but now, as election time approaches, is again lying while “assuring” US support and praising them!
    Fox in the hen house.

  4. Islamic law is ABSOLUTELY incompatible with democracy. It is a theocratic system with Allah alone at its head.

    Allah’s law is interpreted by a ruling body of clerics. There is no room with Islam for a secular political system in which all people are treated as equals.

    Mullah ‘Sufi Muhammad’ said: “True Islam permits neither elections, nor democracy.”

    American scholar Jamal Badawi says that it is the duty of Muslims to bring about Islamic rule: “If a Muslim believes that there is any human being who has the right to make laws other than Allah then obviously this is total divergence from the path of Islam. Or any person who believes that secularism is superior to the law of Allah, he’s violating the basic Quranic tenets”

    Sayyid Qutb said: “It is Allah and not man who rules. Allah is the source of all authority, including legitimate political authority. Virtue, not freedom, is the highest value. Therefore, Allah’s law, not man’s, should govern the society.”

    The Koran is Totalitarian:

    “…Allah and his messenger are free from obligation to the unbelievers…” – Qur’an 9:3

    “It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger to have any option about their decision.” – Qur’an

    “…And never will Allah grant to the unbelievers a way (to triumphs) over the believers.” – Qur’an

    “What! Do those who seek after evil ways think that We shall hold them equal with those who believe and do righteous deeds,- that equal will be their life and their death? Ill is the judgment that they make.” – Qur’an

  5. Heeeeeey ASSLIFTER Imran; THERE ARE “Christian Jews”, there ARE supposedly “Jewish Muslims”, BUT YOU are quite correct in stating that THERE ARE NO democratic ASSLIFTERS, aka. Muslims!! AND YOU ASSLIFTERS WILL NOT DOMINATE Norway, the UK or anywhere in the world except the Middle Eastern ASSLIFTER Territory, and NOT EVEN there forever, ASSLIFTER!!…….And some folks STILL wonder why I despise ASSLIFTERS!!!

  6. FITNA! The purging of the DROSS of impurity!

    Fitna is the GREATEST EVIL in Islam.


    Fitna is punished by DEATH.

    Fitna means if you say Mohammed was not a prophet YOU ARE MURDERED by braindead, vigilante, Mozman, killer zombie, terrorists.

    Allah will reward them in paradise.

    For that reason, ANYONE who says Islam is compatible with democracy is LYING…TAQIYYA.

    Even Shi’ites don’t want Sunnis to be in politics and vice versa…they want to murder fellow Moslems!

    Forget freedom of expression for Jews, Christians, Bahai’s, Hindus, Atheists or women (who are dirtier than dirt…and SHAMEFUL).

    Isn’t Islam loverly?

    NO!!! Islam is supremacist.

  7. Thank you that Man for clearing that up,now thats who you call”Straight from the Camels mouth” NOW will you People in Office in London, and some States of America beleive the threat the General Public face,as Taxpayers,we have the RIGHT to be protected from this Foreign Ideology,this is NOT what People in Western Countries Vote for,when even THEY are admitting it,when you get it straight from a Camel it must be right,i know the Latter part would probably involve D.N.A.evidence but the likeness is eerie.

  8. When are the people who regard themselves as progressive stop associating with and defending muslim extremists? Why do “liberals” attack Israel? It’s the only democracy in the middle east and, ironically, the only one where muslims are safe from other muslims (except the ones firing missiles into Israel).

    • I can’t tell the difference between ‘liberals’ and the ‘Loony Left’ (LL), so I coined the portmanteau word

      “S I N I S L A M”

      as the melding or fusion of ideas from the LL (sinister) and islam. The LL will go hand in hand with mohammedans to destroy Jews, Israel and the west, until the islamic crocodile consumes them, like it did to the Tudeh Party in Iran.

  9. This is on a different topic:
    I want Bare Naked Islam to look into the ‘false’ allegations of American soldiers killing of Afghan civilians…
    I know this is untrue information coming from the enemy of America, Hamid Karzai…

    • hs, look,civilians get killed in every war. In the case of muslims, moreso, because the terrorists hide among them. What the U.S. soldier did over the weekend was wrong but we don’t yet know why he did it. Could be a number of reasons, including the stifling rules of engagement that the Obama Regime has imposed which has resulted in our soldiers getting killed in greater numbers than ever before in this war.

      Personally, I don’t feel anything for the civilians who were killed. Kind of evens out the Ft. Hood Massacre.

      • i would not be surprised if it was because he saw his buddies are being prosecuted for burning the korans and then 6 soldiers killed from protesters. he might reached his limit of how much crap he could take and said two can play that game. i don’t know but i would bet money most guys there feel just as frustrated when you have a commander in chief who is on the enemies side.

        • well maybe it’s time for the soldiers to revolt. only getting hazard pay when you get shot at? are they going to have to pick up the spent rounds to qualify?

  10. I have noticed that in the Middle and Far East except for Japan, India, South Korea and a few other countries that totalitarian dictatorships are quite the norm. Few Asian cultures really understand democracy, even non Muslim ones. But whereas many non Muslim societies are starting to experiment with democracy, Muslim ones seem to be heading toward totalitarian societies and even harsher ones than the ones before.

    The fact that Muslims in general have no concept of democracy was roundly demonstrated in the elections in Egypt where the people voted into power hardcore Islamic fundamentalists who will impose an Islamic fascist state.

Leave a Reply