WALID SHOEBAT uncovers secret document that reveals al-Qaeda ‘brother’ was in charge of security at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA re Libya: “Either you’re with us (U.S. backed al-Qaeda rebels) or you’re with the terrorists (al-Qaeda rebels).” Muammar Gaddafi’s insistent claim that al-Qaeda was behind the Libyan uprising was dismissed at home by the Obama Regime, and abroad, as propaganda.

Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the Libyan rebel leader, admitted that al-Qaeda jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq were on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Gaddafi’s regime. Surely you don’t think they weren’t rewarded for their efforts

SHOEBAT  A treasure trove of secret documents has been obtained by a Libyan source who says that secularists in his country are increasingly wanting to see Mitt Romney defeat Barack Obama on November 6th. This charge is being made despite Muslim Brotherhood losses in Libyan elections last July which resulted in victory for the secularists. One of those documents may help explain this sentiment.

It shows that in supporting the removal of Gadhafi, the Obama administration seemed to sign on to an arrangement that left forces loyal to Al-Qaeda in charge of security at the U.S. embassy in Tripoli from 2011 through at least the spring of 2012.

The National Transitional Council, which represented the political apparatus that opposed Gadhafi in 2011 and served as the interim government after his removal, made an extremely curious appointment in August of 2011. That appointment was none other than Abdel Hakim Belhaj, an Al-Qaeda ally and ‘brother’. Here is a copy of that letter (translation beneath it): READ MORE

While in Jamaica in June of 2011, Hillary Clinton rhetorically asked:

…whose side are you on? Are you on Qadhafi’s side or are you on the side of the aspirations of the Libyan people…

At that very moment – and in light of the release of this secret document – the appropriate question would have been:

…whose side are you on? Are you on Qadhafi’s side or are you on the side of Al-Qaeda…

When put that way, Hillary’s position isn’t nearly as unassailable.