The world is starting to recognize that the problem isn’t ‘radical’ Islam. The problem is Islam!

More than half the Western world now agrees that Islam is a threat and does not belong in the West. Sadly, only 44% of Americans concur…but that number will continue to grow as more and more people begin to understand that Islam does not mean peace and never did…it means ‘submission.’

Israel: 65%

Canada: 49%

USA: 44%

Spain: 65%

Switzerland: 59%

France: 55%

Germany: 50%

Sweden: 48%

Great Britain: 46%

Survey Islam in the West

Islam vs Europe

Ex-Muslim Bosch Fawstin confirms what all of us at BNI know, but most of the world is reluctant, or too chicken to admit.


Bosch Fawstin is a blogger and a cartoonist who calls Islamofascism what it is: ISLAM. Over at Frontpage Magazine, Bosch Fawstin reposts an article he wrote about 3 years ago. 

Western intellectuals and commentators refer to the enemy’s ideology as: “Islamic Fundamentalism,” “Islamic Extremism,” “Totalitarian Islam,” “Islamofascism,” “Political Islam,” “Militant Islam,” “Bin Ladenism,” “Islamonazism,” “Radical Islam,” “Islamism,” etc…

The enemy only calls it “Islam.”


Imagine, if during past wars, we used terms such as “Radical Nazism,” “Extremist Shinto” and “Militant Communism.” The implication would be that there are good versions of those ideologies, which would then lead some to seek out “moderate” Nazis. Those who use terms other than “Islam” create the impression that it’s some variant of Islam that’s behind the enemy that we’re facing. A term such as “Militant Islam” is redundant, but our politicians continue praising Islam as if it were their own religion. {—-}

Islamist the point

Far from being a personal faith, Islam is a collectivist ideology that rejects a live-and-let-live attitude towards non-Muslims. And while the jihadists may not represent all Muslims, they do represent Islam. In the end, most Muslims have proven themselves to be mere sheep to their jihadist wolves, irrelevant as allies in this war. Recovering Muslims call the enemy’s ideology “Islam,” and they dismiss the idea of “Moderate Islam” as they would the idea of “Moderate Evil.” When, based on his actions, Mohammad would be described today as a “Muslim Extremist,” then non-violent Muslims should condemn their prophet and their religion, not those who point it out. {—-}

Another problem with Muslims who aren’t very Muslim is that they lead some among us to conclude that they must be practicing a more enlightened form of Islam. They’re not. They’re “practicing” life in non-Muslim countries, where they are free to live as they choose. But their “Islam” is not the Islam. There’s no separate ideology apart from Islam that’s being practiced by these Muslims in name only, there’s no such thing as “Western Islam”.

Islam means submission NOT peace

Non-observant Muslims are not our problem, but neither are they the solution to our problem. Our problem is Islam and its most consistent practitioners. There is nothing in Islam that stays the hand of Muslims who want to kill non-Muslims. If an individual Muslim is personally peaceful, it’s not because of Islam, it’s because of his individual choice, which is why I often say that your average Muslim is morally superior to Mohammad, to their own religion. The very rare Muslim who helps us against Jihad is acting against his religion, but that doesn’t stop some among us from thinking that his choice somehow shines a good light on Islam. It doesn’t. A good Muslim according to us is a bad Muslim according to Islam.