I oppose the amendment to the Immigration Bill that would subject Muslims to extra scrutiny

The amendment should BAN ALL Muslim immigration. Period. Of course, I oppose the Amnesty Bill altogether, but if there has to be one, it should exclude Muslims.

Screen shot 2013-04-23 at 4.44.53 PM

Think Progress  Terror-linked CAIR slammed an amendment added to the Senate’s comprehensive immigration reform bill that would subject immigrants from MUSLIM countries for extra scrutiny.

The measure, introduced by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and added to the bill with the support of at least two Democrats, would require additional review for illegal aliens applying for legal status who are from “a region or Muslim country known to pose a threat, or that contains groups or organizations that pose a threat, to the national security of the United States.” Under the underlining bill, all illegal aliens are required to undergo three separate background checks before obtaining legal status. In defending his amendment during the Senate Judiciary Committee mark-up on Monday, Graham argued for an additional screening from regions of the world “where MUSLIM terrorists operate.”

719-20080303-PROFILING.large.prod_affiliate.91

“I mean, it’s pretty clear what I’m trying to do,” Graham said. “I’m trying to make sure that in addition to looking at your criminal background, when you adjust status, that if there are certain parts of the world or MUSLIM countries — like Yemen — that you’re adjusting from, I want to know a little more about you, given the world we live in.”

340x_hb9dwxqiutsUnder the provisions of the amendment, the Secretary of Homeland Security would have the broad authority to target any “alien or alien dependent spouse or child” from any region or country that they deem, in consultation with the Secretary of State, to house threats to the United States for additional scrutiny before becoming citizens. “I’m not dictating that [the Secretaries of Homeland Security and State] have to pick any region or country over the other,” Graham said, attempting to deflect criticisms that the amendment focuses specifically on the Middle East.

nseersBut a coalition of MUSLIM and Leftist groups disagreed with Graham’s approach, arguing that the measure was similar to the now-defunct National Security Entry-Exit System (NSEERS), a program set up under the the Bush administration in the aftermath of 9/11. As part of the program, immigrants from twenty-four Muslim majority countries were forced to register into the system, which tracked their entry and exit from the country. The coalition — including the American Civil Liberties Union, NAACP, Arab American Institute, and National Council of La Raza — signed onto a letter addressed to Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Ranking Member Chuck Grassley (R-IA) to condemn the amendment as being the NSEERS reborn.

Graham’s amendment passed by voice vote and was inserted into the overarching bill with support from Sens. Al Franken (D-MN) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), who announced they would back the measure. The overarching bill itself was voted out of committee last night, propelling it to the Senate floor where an effort to remove Graham’s language is likely to take shape.

fcg_terrorists_coming_mexican_border

 

Share