Aug 1 2013
TENNESSEE: Islamic Monster Mosque of Murfreesboro leader says, “Enough is enough,” as mosque opponents continue to keep them tied up in court
Gotta love Tennesseans. An Islamic Indoctrination Center of Murfreesboro leader questioned why plaintiffs opposed to government approval of 52,000 sq. ft. mega mosque construction continue to appeal their case in what has become a three-year ongoing battle against the mosque by the community.
Tennessean “We have already wasted enough energy and money on this issue,” said Saleh Sbenaty, a board member with the mosque.“ Plaintiffs’ attorneys Joe Brandon Jr. of Murfreesboro and Thomas Smith of Franklin filed a request to appeal with the Tennessee Supreme Court on Monday.
The plaintiffs hope the state’s top court will overrule a Tennessee Appeals Court decision in late May that supported the way the Rutherford County Regional Planning Commission approved plans for the ICM to construct a mosque on Veals Road, off Bradyville Pike.
The appeals court had overruled a May 2012 decision by Chancellor Robert Corlew III that the county failed to provide adequate public notice before the planning commissioners approved the ICM’s long-term plans to construct a mosque with 52,960 square feet May 24, 2010. Corlew’s decision voided approval of the mosque and prevented the congregation from pursuing an occupancy permit.
The ICM completed the first 12,000 square feet last August and plans eventually to add a gym, indoor pool, classrooms for weekend religious school and other facilities.
A federal court in Nashville intervened at the request of the U.S. Department of Justice and the ICM in July 2012 and determined that the local case violated the congregation’s First Amendment religious freedom and land-use rights. The federal court ruling allowed the congregation to move into its new mosque in August 2012, before the end of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan, a time when Muslims are to fast during the day, worship at night, seek forgiveness and treat others well.
The federal court decision upset the plaintiffs. Brandon said the state’s top court should review whether the public notice was sufficient.
Sbenaty, the Islamic Indoctrination Center board member, questions what Brandon hopes to accomplish. “He’s doing nothing but chasing ghosts and wasting taxpayers’ money trying to do that,” Sbenaty said during a Tuesday phone interview. “He needs to give it up and find something useful that he can do for the community.”
Brandon disagreed. “I understand that they want Shariah law (ethical codes of conduct for Muslims) in Rutherford County,” said Brandon, who contends that plaintiffs have a right in civil court to examine if the local Muslims pose a threat even though Corlew ruled that such issues should be up to law enforcement. “What is wrong with wanting to ask questions about direct ties to terrorism? What’s the harm in that? Why do we have to undergo cavity searches at the airports? It’s because of the MUSLIMS.”