DUBAI: “I was told to keep quiet or they’d stone me to death,” says British woman wrongly jailed in Dubai for having sex outside marriage

Rebecca Blake, from Surrey, was jailed for a crime she did not commit and ended up serving 95 days in a ‘filthy’ cell.  Speaking to the Sunday Express, the 30-year-old said she was forced to lie about being married or she would face a more severe punishment for adultery and could have been stoned to death.


(No sympathy here. This is what you get for moving to a Muslim country)

UK Daily Mail  The recruitment consultant was accused of having sex in the back of a taxi with her friend Conor McRedmond 28, from Tullamore, Co. Offaly and they spent a year fighting the allegations.  Ms Blake said her lawyer told her to keep the fact she was already technically married, from six years ago, a secret as if the authorities knew she was married she could be charged with the more serious crime of adultery.


Now back in Britain, Ms Blake said: ‘It feels like a surreal nightmare. I still wake up in the night panicking, thinking I’m back in that cell.’ Blake and McRedmond  were arrested on May 4 last year after meeting at a brunch then going on a drinking binge – getting a taxi together at 10pm.

Taxi driver Qaiser Khan, 30, claimed within minutes of getting in, Blake had taken her top off and was writhing on top of McRedmond while ‘making the sounds of a woman having sex’. He told prosecutors earlier this year: ‘They kept having sex for four minutes. The man’s shirt was open, his trousers were down to his knees and the woman was not wearing any underwear.’

Dressing like this in Dubai isn't exactly a good idea
Dressing like this in Dubai isn’t exactly a good idea

The taxi driver alleged Blake offered him ‘a lot of money’ to tell prosecutors they had been kissing rather than having sex, but he refused. They said the allegations had been made up after they rowed with the taxi driver about taking a longer route home.

Their lawyer Shaker al Shammary yesterday said the statements of the two witnesses were inconsistent, adding: ‘They threatened to complain about the taxi driver and he beat them to it – yet there is no mention of their dispute in the Supreme Court judgment. ‘The medical records show what the witnesses said was not true but this was not taken into account in the ruling.’