By BareNakedIslam •
December 9, 2013 @ 3:07 am
Half measures are useless; a total waste of resources. Islam must be exterminated entirely. Allah demands perpetual war; unending terror and genocide until the entire globe is conquered. Muslims are threatened with eternal damnation if they shirk and propmised Paradise if they perform. So long as they live and believe, we can have no peace or security.
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia should have been nuked immediately after the Goddamn Abomination.
There is no excuse for sending our young men to bleed and die in Dar ul-Islam because they can accomplish nothing in the abscense of political will to de-islamize the population and the regime. There is no alternative to complete eradication of Islam. They quit believing or they quit living because they will never quit warring. Which will it be?
December 8, 2013 @ 7:34 pm
The A bomb whipping we gave the japanese in WW 2, was enough to show them that we had the bomb and we were prepared to use it. Respect. A couple of A bombs strategically placed to show appropriate retaliation to the muslims for the results of killing Americans on 9-11 would have been a better response then the many lives lost and the 13 years we have wasted in the middle east. Destroy an American embassy and say good bye to one of your hell hole cities. Yes, we will give you one week notice, to leave the city before we turn it into rubble. All care would be taken to ensure that the fall out did not impact on Israel. Kill an ambassador in libya, say good bye to one of your cities. Respect.
December 8, 2013 @ 3:16 pm
The neutron bomb is the efficient and appropriate weapon to remove Marxist Anthrax Islam from a land area for radiation from neutron enhanced dissipates in only 10 years compared to much longer period for standard nukes. After 10 years the Buddhists and Hindus who were driven out by raptor lizards could return.”imamcile’ Jimmy Carter knew this but stopped production because he could not use it on jews with America not being a Caliphate. Death to Marxist Anthrax Islam!
December 8, 2013 @ 4:49 pm
George HW Bush got rid of all our neuron bombs I understand. But Israel still has them.
December 8, 2013 @ 7:54 pm
Part of the reason that they are not in the US inventory is that their effectiveness as an anti tank weapon has been largely negated by the increased thickness of modern tank walls. Although 50% of the bomb yield is expressed as high energy neutrons rather then 5% or less, the blast effects are still considerable. Other suggested uses were as anti ballistic missile devices for frying the electronics of ICBMs. France and China may still possess such weapons. The most logical use for them would be to fight a limited nuclear war on one’s OWN territory against overwhelming infantry and light armor.
December 8, 2013 @ 8:07 pm
LK, I thought they killed people and left the infrastructure in tact? Who cares about penetrating tanks when you can wipe out most of the population?
December 9, 2013 @ 1:14 am
I believe they were originally conceived for fighting a limited nuclear war in Europe against a force of armor. Being as Germany is densely populated the lesser the blast effects the better. With 50% of the yield in the form of fast neutrons anyone behind an inch or two of iron or aluminum would receive a lethal dose of secondary radiation as the neutrons slammed into iron or aluminum atoms and created a cascade of secondary radiation (alpha and beta, more neutrons and maybe some gamma). A one KT weapon would cause heat and blast damage for about 500 meters (5 football fields). Unprotected soldiers within 900 metres would receive upwards of 3,000 REMs essentually killing them immediately. This effect would be effected further out for troops in armor or APCs. Upwards of 1,500 Metres radiation levels would cause death within days to weeks with soldiers capable of “intermitent heroic response” (that phrase was lifted from one of my CBR manuals). The material damage inflicted would be more on a scale of a large tornado (different geometry obviously) then Hiroshima. With decent civil defense and evacuation procedures civilian deaths could be held to a minimum. Relatively speaking a very gentle H-Bomb.
December 9, 2013 @ 1:45 am
LK, so why did we get rid of them?
December 9, 2013 @ 2:34 am
Because after the collapse of the Soviet Union our focus changed. The apocalyptic tank war in central Europe was relegated to a might have been alternate history. The two and a half war doctrine became one and a half wars. At best, the “Neutron Bomb” got a bad PR rep as the bomb that destroys people not property rather then more accurately the bomb that kills a lot less people. Again from a PR viewpoint, the only situation in which it could be used was as a last ditch measure against an enemy that was over running us (which is what we trained for when I was in Germany).
December 8, 2013 @ 7:06 am
How awful the devastation of nuclear weaponry … yet how effective.
December 8, 2013 @ 7:19 pm
The napalm attacks on German and Japanese cities were as destructive and in some cases worse. Difference, one plane, one bomb vs 1,000 + planes and tens of thousands of bombs. The destruction of Hamburg was used as a stand in for the effects of an H-Bomb on a metropolitan area in studies during the 1950’s.
December 8, 2013 @ 4:22 am
This should be juxtaposed to the Sack of Nanking also called the Rape of Nanking by the Japanese Army. The surrendered Chinese troops were killed, then the Japanese were given free reign of the city for 6 months with instructions to kill all men and boys of fighting age and allowed to use any woman or girl for their sexual needs. All together in excess of 300,000 Chinese were murdered in this city alone. Also an illuminating item is Demons from Hiroshima (Self Confessions from Soldiers of the Hiroshima Territorial Army) http://www.zzwave.com/cmfweb/wiihist/hiroshima/
December 8, 2013 @ 1:45 am
I was young during WW II, but old enough to remember it from beginning to end. There was no ambiguity either in the Pacific or European theaters — WE WERE IN TO TO WIN IT! Our Generals and Admirals were revered and our soldiers and sailors were respected as heros. in the windows of homes all over America, were seen star-studded hanging flags indicating pridefully that a family member was off at war. Since then, we have fought wars not really to win, but to accomplish political goals, which accounts for running various war efforts through congressional committees, not through military executive expertise. I say that some wars are very much worth fighting; but none are worth fighting if our professional military warriors have their hands tied via restrictive rules of engagement, are not there to win, but rather to spend the bulk of their time on “outreach” and humanitarian efforts. Win first and then rebuild. That formula worked after WW II. The scars are deep, but the progress is undeniable.
December 8, 2013 @ 2:47 pm
the Rules of Engagement is the resaon some many of our soldiers have needlessly died since. no total commitment
December 8, 2013 @ 7:33 pm
One reason is that the post WW II conflicts were through proxies rather then the primary opponent. An all out war with the Soviet Union would have taxed the resources of the US possibly beyond its capabilities. As it was, the cold war broke the Soviet Union economically.
December 8, 2013 @ 1:44 am
From what I see the Japanese love the US. And their honesty and politeness is beyond reproach.
Not quite Islam or Muslims who in business will haggle and haggle until all goodwill is destroyed.
They don’t care and even when the final agreed invoice is submitted they’ll argue about that.
However, a while back I traded electric guitars from Jp. on eBay.
Both Gibson and Fender manufacture there to an amazing standard and there are lots of others whose copies are legendary.
And not one bad deal out of hundreds. They are almost fanatical in making sure that you are happy. That’s the huge difference.
On the other hand you know that any dealings with Muslims will always leave you angry, drained and never wanting to see another again as long as you live.
Lots of people will argue about the use of the bomb. It was a step into the abyss, of that there’s no question.
Back then we had this awesome power and if that power could hasten the end, no matter the awful destruction rained upon the enemy, we used it.
Now? You know the rest.
December 8, 2013 @ 4:56 am
The Japanese authorities were terrified when faced with occupation. They advised women to stay indoors and wear white make up to look sickly and unattractive. General MacArthur was an astute manager of the Occupation using Hirohito as his basis for authority.
December 8, 2013 @ 12:11 am
Islam’s war against the West is clandestine and cannot be handled with A-bombs. Most Moslem countries actively discourage jihad while pretending to believe in it.
December 8, 2013 @ 1:29 am
It’s hard to disagree with the “clandestine” part….but could you tell us which Muslim countries actively discourage jihad? That would be educational for us all. I am generally led to believe that, to be a Muslim one MUST join in and support jihad, even if one leaves the actual killing and maiming to others.
December 8, 2013 @ 12:09 am
The Japanese Shinto system has many similarities with Islam.
However, that’s where the similarities between Japanese people and Islam ends. When they join a Western country, Japanese TOTALLY assimilate, unlike Moslems. They become more patriotic and conformist than practically any group of immigrants. This phenomenon is the same wherever Japanese go. On the other, wherever Moslems go, they create ghettoes and discriminatory no-go zones and begin undermining the countries that kindly take them in by violence, rape, theft and drug dealing. Where are the Japanese pedophile gangs or drug dealing mafias? No where in any Western country! Japanese in the West are model, desirable citizens. God bless ’em.
December 8, 2013 @ 12:46 am
What similarities would those be? I lived in Japan and saw nothing that was like Islam.
December 8, 2013 @ 4:37 am
Shinto (Way of the G-ds) is a pantheism that serves as a adjunct to Buddhism in modern Japan. Zen Buddhism served as a spiritual support for the Samurai warrior’s code (Bushido).
December 7, 2013 @ 9:11 pm
I would **LOVE** to see the Islamic countries NUKED.
The best way against Pakistan would be to let India in on the plans and do a two -way nuking – both the US and India nuking them. Nuking Iran would be a piece of cake.
Then there is Saudi Barbaria. Nuke the hell out of Mecca, Medina and all other cities there.
Next should be Indonesia – the most populous Muslim country (200 million – how the hell they can fit on those islands beats me, but anyway….). Bang, flash, gone. About 20 nukes should do them.
That would be sooooo good to hear about!
December 8, 2013 @ 4:41 am
I remember more then a few commentators on the Beijing Daily People’s English blog advocating the reduction of Indonesia to radioactive glass. Desired payback for 1965.
December 7, 2013 @ 8:04 pm
I agree. One good strike would have conveyed the message and America the Great would have been restored.
Instead, we are still stuck with the ever-growing problem of islam and the economy has crashed because of it. All these American deaths for nothing. Sad, sad, sad.
December 7, 2013 @ 7:34 pm
Did Rosy know that the attack was coming?
His papers were sealed for 50 years in 1945.
When 1995 came the papers were sealed for another
50 years. I wonder why?
December 9, 2013 @ 11:16 am
More likely the deals that were made with the Soviet Union regarding Eastern Europe.
December 7, 2013 @ 7:25 pm
All we need is the will and the balls to do it.
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.