By BareNakedIslam •
Say WHAT? •
December 30, 2013 @ 12:09 pm
the NEW YORK TIMES is just a newspaper that most likely doesn’t have access to the truth.
December 30, 2013 @ 6:50 am
For the assholes at the NYT, tell that to the dead heroes’ families. You people are really getting to french kiss as much islamic ass as the White House does.
December 30, 2013 @ 5:34 am
So what if the attackers were not card carying al-Qaeda members? They are God damn Muslims, which is what counts; all it takes. As the wise man stated: “Its Islam, stupid.”.
There is one terrorist group: Islam, all the rest is persiflauge.
December 30, 2013 @ 1:10 am
They must slightly distance themselves from Clinton so they can show this record and thus “prove” they are objective and that way when they get into the slugfest as it nears the end, they can fight completely for her side while maintaining that they have objectivity. Yes, it is a setup. A game of three card monte, there.
December 30, 2013 @ 12:46 am
Didn’t anyone listen to Irans cheif when he said the agreement with Obama was a joke and they had NO intent of standing by it? Come on, did you really expect anything different?
Obama and Clinton are responsible for this botched operation. Too bad neither one has any experience in this field and, very much regrettably, they are NOT being held accountable.
December 30, 2013 @ 12:15 am
Ever heard of the Dirty Nuke Bomb ?
Expect one to explode in America , Europe or India …very soon.
To be supplied with Love by Pakistan or Iran…
December 29, 2013 @ 11:01 pm
The NYT is bad enough but how on EARTH could New Yorkers vote for a **socialist mayor?**
I think they’ll be in for some nasty shocks in the next few years.
December 30, 2013 @ 2:09 am
Entitlement whores outnumber working people in NYC.
December 30, 2013 @ 3:53 am
Ahh. Yes, that would explain it.
Thanks for that.
December 29, 2013 @ 8:49 pm
The “new york times” – the fish wrapper of record (lower case intentional).
December 29, 2013 @ 8:28 pm
Sleep with dogs, you get fleas. Lick liberal ass, you turn brown and stink!
They deserve to lose it all.
December 29, 2013 @ 8:22 pm
This rag is such a joke…beats me how they can continue to stay in business…who wastes good money buying such crap? They are so deep in their own do-do that they can no longer smell it.
December 29, 2013 @ 9:28 pm
Like the “National Enquirer”, people know it’s all bullshit but they like the stories for the laughs. It’s a “bathroom pass-time”. The NYT has gone this same route.
December 29, 2013 @ 8:19 pm
They do have decent science reporting and interesting real estate reporting. The rest is good for kitty litter.
December 29, 2013 @ 10:08 pm
On the few occasions I saw it, it used to be also very good for classical-music reviews (if it isn’t any longer…), leading one to presume it also would be good for the arts in general.
Otherwise, I too won’t shed any tears when it dies…
December 29, 2013 @ 8:14 pm
We all know the National Enquirer is more credible than New York Times.
My gut feeling tells me they came out with this cockamamie story to help Hillary get elected. I feel the Clinton influence.
December 29, 2013 @ 9:15 pm
SK, I think you’re exactly right. But, the Times trashed the Clintons not long ago. Maybe this is their repentance.
December 30, 2013 @ 5:31 am
Maybe they were threatened.
December 30, 2013 @ 1:45 pm
December 30, 2013 @ 12:12 pm
you’re probably right on this. Unfortunately americans have short attention spans.and if Hilliary actually gets the Dem nomination or Chris Chris Christie gets the nomination we will be in deeper doo-doo than we are now
December 30, 2013 @ 12:42 pm
Susan, the NYT can grovel to her all it wants, even if she makes it to the run of the WH, her infamous “What difference does it make…” will always come back to haunt her in more ways than one. And rightly so considering her ill-feelings towards Marines, along with the rest.
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.