By BareNakedIslam •
March 30, 2015 @ 11:12 pm
Without a doubt Islamic countries, whether with ‘more’ democracy than others, or full on Sharia run countries either already have nuclear weapons or access to obtaining them v quickly. With religious idiocy behind them all however there are no checks on the use of them. Meaning they don’t have much concern for consequences as their blind belief in a supernatural being is all the protection they think they need. We all hope they will wipe each other out and probably great impact in the region will occur. I often remember St John’s the divine’s ‘Book of Revelation’ and the ‘flying scroll’ destroying a great city by the water which is the busiest sea lane in the world. Destroyed in one great huge plume of smoke. The gulf’s now the world’s busiest sea lane because of the oil, through the Suez canal. Hope its Mecca, or their other city, begins with R. Cant quite remember how to spell it! Ha. He saw a missile but to him it looked like a ‘flying scroll’. Its inevitable that they will viciously attack each other, they do it everyday on smaller scale and blinded by religious hate and fanaticism will hit bigtime with the giant weaponry. Perfect……’evil will destroy itself’ The rest of us have to make the biggest effort to survive this fight ‘between the evils’. With a billion muslims removed from the planet, as we are already too many for the poor earth will ASSIST a great deal.
March 30, 2015 @ 3:18 pm
Not only Jews, obama is the greatest threat to all non-muslims–everywhere.
March 28, 2015 @ 8:52 pm
Iran says that it want alternative energies. Have they been trying solar power and other means in the mean time? Or is it just a complete ruse? I am curious but have not researched this question. Taquiyya is such a big part of islam.
March 28, 2015 @ 6:01 pm
March 28, 2015 @ 5:19 pm
big fan of Mark him an ol Lt. Col. Ralph Peters call a spade a spade love it when they get turned loose on obama
March 28, 2015 @ 5:13 pm
Levin said in same sentence that of Obama hating Jews and Putin starting the aggression in Ukraine (this is not factually true)…so i would take anything coming from Levin with a grain of salt…he stops just short of telling how it really is…he is part of controlled opposition…
March 28, 2015 @ 3:40 pm
obama is a danger to the whole world and congress is too scaree to file impeachment charges on him for aiding and abetting the enemy
yet his attacks on Israel wil continue
March 28, 2015 @ 12:27 pm
Mark has the guts to say this, and he is right.
I’m sure the Regime carefully transcribed this show as well. (Levin has mentioned that it is his understanding that the Administration transcribes his shows.)
March 28, 2015 @ 11:09 am
Mark Levin like Michael Savage is an oddball. He professes to enjoy a bacon,lettuce & cheese hamburger – tho I suspect with turkey bacon. Right about Muslim Brotherhood Obama of course but but he says George Soros is just a megalomaniac; Soros funded Obama and funds ISIL/ISIS.
March 28, 2015 @ 12:34 pm
CN, Mark is like most Jews today who eat bacon, REAL bacon, and other pork products. If you consider him an oddball, you consider me an oddball.
March 30, 2015 @ 10:50 pm
Well said Bonni. Very well said :))
March 28, 2015 @ 9:16 am
The THIEF HAS COME to STEAL, to KILL AND to DESTROY.
God-hater, Muslim Obama lusts for the total destruction of Infidel Israel and Infidel America. Bloodthirsty Obama lusts after Jewish annihilation.
Iran has vowed repeatedly to ‘Wipe Israel off the map’, and, ‘DESTROY America’. Obama — the DESTROYER, is committed to doing everything in his power to make Iran’s wicked goal become a reality.
Will no one stop the DESTROYER from inflicting a nuclear holocaust upon the earth?
March 28, 2015 @ 5:27 am
Not only is this ignorant 1930s Kenyan Muslim man a threat to Jewish people but also to Christians everwhere. Of course not to pass over the already dead and impending deaths in his Muslim protectorates for whom it is too late. This not a time to be wondering where the allegiance of the leaders lies. Certainly not a time for open borders.
March 28, 2015 @ 2:05 am
I’ve not heard of Mark Levin before. Thanks so much for the video. I checked out some of his podcasts. On a related matter I listened to Mark Levin absolutely rip into Bowe Bergdahl, Obama and the Pentagon etc. The USA has some great conservative voices. Levin’s awesome!
“3/25/15-Mark Levin Audio Rewind
Mark talks about Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, who was charged Wednesday with desertion and misbehavior before the enemy”
March 28, 2015 @ 3:11 am
Eric, Mark’s great.
March 28, 2015 @ 4:24 am
But he should have said oliar is a threat globally.
March 28, 2015 @ 1:01 am
BNI, the following is a good read on how odumbo’s move to support iran will lead to nuclear proliferation in the middle east. It may be too long to post. I will leave that up to your good judgement.
To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran
The New York Times | March 26, 2015. J.Bolton
For years, experts worried that the Middle East would face an uncontrollable nuclear-arms race if Iran ever acquired weapons capability. Given the region’s political, religious and ethnic conflicts, the logic is straightforward.
As in other nuclear proliferation cases like India, Pakistan and North Korea, America and the West were guilty of inattention when they should have been vigilant. But failing to act in the past is no excuse for making the same mistakes now. All presidents enter office facing the cumulative effects of their predecessors’ decisions. But each is responsible for what happens on his watch. President Obama’s approach on Iran has brought a bad situation to the brink of catastrophe.
In theory, comprehensive international sanctions, rigorously enforced and universally adhered to, might have broken the back of Iran’s nuclear program. But the sanctions imposed have not met those criteria. Naturally, Tehran wants to be free of them, but the president’s own director of National Intelligence testified in 2014 that they had not stopped Iran’s progressing its nuclear program. There is now widespread acknowledgment that the rosy 2007 National Intelligence Estimate, which judged that Iran’s weapons program was halted in 2003, was an embarrassment, little more than wishful thinking.
Even absent palpable proof, like a nuclear test, Iran’s steady progress toward nuclear weapons has long been evident. Now the arms race has begun: Neighbouring countries are moving forward, driven by fears that Mr. Obama’s diplomacy is fostering a nuclear Iran. Saudi Arabia, keystone of the oil-producing monarchies, has long been expected to move first. No way would the Sunni Saudis allow the Shiite Persians to outpace them in the quest for dominance within Islam and Middle Eastern geopolitical hegemony. Because of reports of early Saudi funding, analysts have long believed that Saudi Arabia has an option to obtain nuclear weapons from Pakistan, allowing it to become a nuclear-weapons state overnight. Egypt and Turkey, both with imperial legacies and modern aspirations, and similarly distrustful of Tehran, would be right behind.
Ironically perhaps, Israel’s nuclear weapons have not triggered an arms race. Other states in the region understood – even if they couldn’t admit it publicly – that Israel’s nukes were intended as a deterrent, not as an offensive measure.
Iran is a different story. Extensive progress in uranium enrichment and plutonium reprocessing reveal its ambitions. Saudi, Egyptian and Turkish interests are complex and conflicting, but faced with Iran’s threat, all have concluded that nuclear weapons are essential.
The former Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Turki al-Faisal, said recently, “whatever comes out of these talks, we will want the same.” He added, “if Iran has the ability to enrich uranium to whatever level, it’s not just Saudi Arabia that’s going to ask for that.” Obviously, the Saudis, Turkey and Egypt will not be issuing news releases trumpeting their intentions. But the evidence is accumulating that they have quickened their pace toward developing weapons.
Saudi Arabia has signed nuclear cooperation agreements with South Korea, China, France and Argentina, aiming to build a total of 16 reactors by 2030. The Saudis also just hosted meetings with the leaders of Pakistan, Egypt and Turkey; nuclear matters were almost certainly on the agenda. Pakistan could quickly supply nuclear weapons or technology to Egypt, Turkey and others. Or, for the right price, North Korea might sell behind the backs of its Iranian friends. s
The Obama administration’s increasingly frantic efforts to reach agreement with Iran have spurred demands for ever-greater concessions from Washington. Successive administrations, Democratic and Republican, worked hard, with varying success, to forestall or terminate efforts to acquire nuclear weapons by states as diverse as South Korea, Taiwan, Argentina, Brazil and South Africa. Even where civilian nuclear reactors were tolerated, access to the rest of the nuclear fuel cycle was typically avoided. Everyone involved understood why.
This gold standard is now everywhere in jeopardy because the president’s policy is empowering Iran. Whether diplomacy and sanctions would ever have worked against the hard-liners running Iran is unlikely. But abandoning the red line on weapons-grade fuel drawn originally by the Europeans in 2003, and by the United Nations Security Council in several resolutions, has alarmed the Middle East and effectively handed a permit to Iran’s nuclear weapons establishment.
The inescapable conclusion is that Iran will not negotiate away its nuclear program. Nor will sanctions block its building a broad and deep weapons infrastructure. The inconvenient truth is that only military action like Israel’s 1981 attack on Saddam Hussein’s Osirak reactor in Iraq or its 2007 destruction of a Syrian reactor, designed and built by North Korea, can accomplish what is required. Time is terribly short, but a strike can still succeed.
Rendering inoperable the Natanz and Fordow uranium-enrichment installations and the Arak heavy-water production facility and reactor would be priorities. So, too, would be the little-noticed but critical uranium-conversion facility at Isfahan. An attack need not destroy all of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, but by breaking key links in the nuclear-fuel cycle, it could set back its program by three to five years. The United States could do a thorough job of destruction, but Israel alone can do what’s necessary. Such action should be combined with vigorous American support for Iran’s opposition, aimed at regime change in Tehran.
Mr. Obama’s fascination with an Iranian nuclear deal always had an air of unreality. But by ignoring the strategic implications of such diplomacy, these talks have triggered a potential wave of nuclear programs. The president’s biggest legacy could be a thoroughly nuclear-weaponized Middle East.
March 28, 2015 @ 12:53 am
odumbo, is the greatest threat to the Jews, since Moses lead the chosen people out of Egypt 4,000 years ago. Supporting Iran and allowing this shia muslum cess pool to have nuclear bombs will immediately mean that sunni Saudi Arabia, and all of the sunni cess pool countries will also demand to have nuclear weapons. north korea, pakistan, iran and so on, will supply nuclear bombs to the highest bidder. This will cause every middle east muslum hell hole country to want nuclear weapons.
March 28, 2015 @ 12:26 am
I saw one of responses on Sean Hannity & think I agree; as we have seen, beliefs from a leader filter down.
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.