The Muslim Student Association at San Diego State University is calling on officials at the public, taxpayer-funded school develop a formal policy outlawing political speech they dislike and commentary about Islam that they find offensive and blasphemous under sharia law.
Daily Caller (h/t Susan K) “We demand that the SDSU administration enact a zero tolerance policy explicitly for Islamophobic speech and actions . The goal of the far-reaching demands, Muslim Student Association members say, is to prevent anyone from grabbing a hijab in the future.
The highlight of the extensive list of demands from “We the Muslim Student Association at San Diego State University” is a call for a ban on “Islamophobic speech.”
We the Muslim Student Association at San Diego State University…
Demand of Students:
- We demand that the students who witnessed the attack step forward and help aid in the investigation
- We demand that students create a more inclusive campus climate by promoting tolerance and acceptance between different cultures and religions
Demand of SDSU Administration:
- We demand that the SDSU administration enact a zero tolerance policy explicitly for Islamophobic speech and actions as well as targeted bigotry towards any other identity group
- We demand that the SDSU administration make bystander training mandatory for faculty, staff, and students
- We demand that the SDSU administration increase coursework offered on Islam that is balanced and comprehensive to create a more informed and accepting SDSU community – and alleviate misconceptions and hate toward the Muslim students on campus
- We demand that the SDSU administration provide substantially more funding for The Center for Intercultural Relations as necessitated by the needs of the students, and to give the Center more autonomy in representing the best interests of marginalized students
- We demand that the SDSU administration address, alleviate, and eliminate systems of oppression that disproportionately target students of color, womyn, and all marginalized students on campus
Demand of our Local, State, and National leaders:
- We demand that our government officials at a local, state, and federal level cease their fear mongering anti-Islamic rhetoric, and that they recognize that the dehumanization of refugees and scapegoating of the Muslim faith enables an environment for attacks like this to occur
The San Diego State Muslim Student Association originally cooked up the demands — eight in total — last month after an unidentified female Muslim student claimed she was attacked by a white male in a parking lot on campus. The attack allegedly occurred on the afternoon of Thursday, Nov. 19 — six days after a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in Paris, France.
The white assailant allegedly ran up behind the Muslim student and grabbed her hijab, she claimed. He then called her a terrorist, “choked her with the hajib” and said she should “get out of this country,” according to a contemporaneous report by The San Diego Union-Tribune.
Witnesses — also unidentified — failed to intervene, the hijab-wearing student alleged.
In addition to a ban on certain offensive speech, the Muslim Student Association is also clamoring for the state-supported school to “make bystander training mandatory for faculty, staff, and students.” (“Bystander training” is instruction to encourage people to report crimes and problems.)
San Diego State’s Muslims also demand more coursework “offered on Islam,” “substantially more funding for The Center for Intercultural Relations” and the complete elimination of “systems of oppression that disproportionately target students of color, womyn, and all marginalized students on campus.”
A policy banning “Islamophobic speech” at a state-funded university in California would be unlikely to withstand constitutional scrutiny. None of the eight demands of the San Diego State’s Muslim students have been met.
The California state constitution states: “Every person may freely speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of this right. A law may not restrain or abridge liberty of speech or press.
Two months after asking Columbus’ mayor and police chief to reconsider the head-scarf ban for female Muslim police-officer candidates, a local lawyer is asking again for the city to re-evaluate its policy. In short, yet another reason why you should never hire a Muslim. (Muslim men will sue you if you don’t allow long, bushy beards on the job)
Dispatch Frederick M. Gittes, who is also president of Protecting Ohio’s Employees, recently sent another letter to Mayor Michael B. Coleman, Police Chief Kim Jacobs and Mayor-elect Andrew J. Ginther. Gittes said neither Coleman nor Jacobs responded to his letter sent in October.
Kadra Mohamed is the first Somali Muslim woman to join the St. Paul Police Department, a move made possible by the department’s announcement that it has approved an option for employees to wear a police-issued headbag.
“I never heard back from you, never received an acknowledgment,” Gittes said on Wednesday, when he sent another letter. “I think this issue needs to be reconsidered and discussed.” The new letter calls the ban “unwise, unnecessary and counterproductive.”
Jacobs will not be responding to either letter because of an August complaint that the Ohio chapter of the designated terrorist group Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, filed with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission, said Sgt. Rich Weiner, Columbus police spokesman. That case remains open.
CAIR filed an employment-discrimination complaint over Columbus officials’ refusal to allow female officers to wear head scarves. It filed the complaint after Columbus Mayor Michael Coleman recently told the Columbus Dispatch that he supports the headbag ban.
CAIR-Ohio brings this complaint to end the discriminatory ban on the hiring of Muslim women who wear a religious headscarf by Columbus Division of Police,” Romin Iqbal, a Staff Attorney in the Ohio chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, wrote in a complaint filed with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission
In the October letter, the two groups said that statements made by Coleman and Jacobs in a Dispatch story that month “fail to recognize the importance of a diverse and representative police force and condone prejudice, however unintentionally.”
The story quoted Coleman as saying: “When officers go out into the community, they should be identified as Columbus police officers, not Muslim police officers, not Christian police officers, not Jewish police officers, not Hindus, Baptists or anything else.”
Police Chief Jacobs is quoted as saying: “I want whoever pulls up to the scene as being recognized as a Columbus police officer that doesn’t turn anyone off.” He was quoted warning against hijab-wearing officers “turning anyone off” and stating, “If it’s a head scarf next week, it might be a burqa the next week.”
Inside job? Insurance fraud? CAIR spokeswhiners aren’t yet declaring that the fire was an “Islamophobic hate crime” but are demanding that authorities investigate it for an “anti-Muslim motive.”
CNN The Islamic Center of Houston caught fire after Friday prayers, when the place was “pretty much empty,” center president M.J. Khan said. No injuries were reported in the two-alarm fire, drawing 80 firefighters, according to officials and CNN affiliate KTRK. The mosque was in a strip mall, and the smoke also damaged a pharmacy next door, the affiliate reported.
Republican strategist Frank Luntz sought to gauge the attitudes of an ostensibly “ordinary” panel of Muslims in America towards Donald Trump and the state of Israel. Undeclared to the audience, however, on the panel is a professional left-wing Palestinian Muslim agitator and Israel-basher, Linda Sarsour (photo above), who is an alumnus of the Obama Regime.
Daily Wire Linda Sarsour (front row wearing beige headbag), an anti-American hater of Israel, Islamic supremacist, and regular commentator on left-wing media, was not identified as such when offering her views on Trump and Israel. Rather, she was presented as an ordinary Muslim in America.
Sarsour warned of psychological damage to Muslim children who hear Donald Trump’s words. “I don’t want my children to be subjected to racism and the vilification of their faith.”
One Muslim panelist warned that Trump’s statements would inspire mass murder and Islamic terrorism from Muslims. “If Trump keeps doing what he’s doing, and he’s elected President, that number (of Muslims in America who might commit Islamic terrorist attacks), whatever it may be, will skyrocket.”
Recently, Sarsour joined MSNBC’s Melissa Harris-Perry in condemning the media for displaying photos of Tashfeen Malik—the female half of the Islamic terrorist mass murdering couple in San Bernardino—wearing her Muslim supremacist hijab.
Luntz neglected to ask the panel any questions about efforts to combat Islamic terrorism among Muslims, a subject Sarsour openly resents.
This is the same Muslim supremacist and sharia-supporting Linda Sarsour who posts videos of her Palestinian father blasting loud, offensive Arabic music in the streets of Brooklyn just to annoy his non-Muslim neighbors.
CLICK PHOTO BELOW TO HEAR THE DISGUSTING MUSIC