UK: Pig’s head found outside Islamic Center in Ellesmere Port

A man has been arrested after a pig’s head was placed outside an Islamic cultural centre in Ellesmere Port. Police were called to King Street after a member of the public reported suspicious activity outside the Islamic Cultural Centre shortly before midnight on Oct. 23rd.


Chester Chronicle  A pig’s head was found at the building, police have confirmed.

A 41-year-old man from Ellesmere Port was arrested in the early hours of this morning (Thursday) on suspicion of committing a racially aggravated public order offense. He remains in police custody and enquiries are ongoing.

Officers remain at the scene of the cultural centre, which is currently under construction after being granted planning permission by Cheshire West and Chester Council earlier this month amidst angry scenes.


Police have vowed to put an end to all racist incidents and hate crimes in Ellesmere Port following the latest attack on the centre, which will be used as a place of worship and to hold religious festivals terrorist training sessions.

Chief Inspector Giles Orton said: “Local residents can be reassured that the police have a high visibility presence in the area. “Through firm policing we will put an end to racially aggravated incidents in Ellesmere Port. (What ‘race’ is Islam?) “Hate crimes are not tolerated within this community.” (Then why is Islam allowed to be practiced there? Islam is a hate crime against humanity)

The vow comes as a facebook group containing racist content, including images of pigs and anti Islamic messages, reached almost 600 likes. (What ‘race’ is Islam?)

The ‘community’ page, named ‘Ban Ellesmere Port Mosque’, was set up on September 12 by an unnamed individual, and says it aims to “stop Muslims taking over Ellesmere Port” and “keeping Britain British”.


When asked about the social media page today (Wednesday) police and community leaders would not comment due to ongoing enquiries, and would not confirm whether it was connected with the incident.



WOW! Britain grows a pair, refusing to rescue illegal alien Muslim parasites who might drown trying to invade EU

The UK refuses to launch rescue operations for illegal alien Muslims drowning in the Mediterranean because it might encourage more Muslims to attempt the dangerous crossing from Africa.

Hordes of Muslim parasites invading Europe form the sea

Hordes of Muslim male parasites and criminals invading Europe from the sea

UK Daily Mail (h/t Maria J)  More than 100,000 mostly muslim illegals have reached Italy since the turn of the year and only 2,000 have died trying, according to the UN refugee body UNHCR. The Italian mission in the Mediterranean is being wound up after rescuing tens of thousands of people, but Britain insists offering help will act as a ‘pull factor’ to others to seek refuge in Europe.

The Refugee Council warned that the UK’s stance will contribute to more people ‘needlessly and shamefully dying on Europe’s doorstep’. (And this is a BAD thing because why?)

Stupid Italy, rescuing muslim parasites who will rape their women and live off welfare while endangering native Italians

Stupid Italy, rescuing muslim invaders who will rape their women. live off welfare, and endanger native Italians

But ministers insist that if migrants know they will be saved if they get into trouble, more people will attempt to make the treacherous journey from north Africa. Foreign Office Minister Baroness Anelay told peers this month: ‘We do not support planned search and rescue operations in the Mediterranean.

‘We believe that they create an unintended ‘pull factor’, encouraging more migrants to attempt the dangerous sea crossing and thereby leading to more tragic and unnecessary deaths. (The last thing Europe needs is more muslims)


‘The Government believes the most effective way to prevent refugees and migrants attempting this dangerous crossing is to focus our attention on countries of origin and transit, as well as taking steps to fight the people-smugglers who wilfully put lives at risk by packing migrants into unseaworthy boats.’

Refugee Council chief executive Maurice Wren said: ‘The British Government seems oblivious to the fact that the world is in the grip of the greatest refugee crisis since the Second World War. (Then let the oil rich Arab Gulf states take them)

EU-Innenminister reden über Flüchtlingswelle

‘People fleeing atrocities will not stop coming if we stop throwing them life rings; boarding a rickety boat in Libya will remain a seemingly rational decision if you’re running for your life and your country is in flames. (Run to Saudi Arabia, it’s a lot closer, richer, and muslim-friendly)

‘The only outcome of withdrawing help will be to witness more people needlessly and shamefully dying on Europe’s doorstep. (You say that as if it’s a BAD thing)


The new operation, called Triton and run by the EU’s Frontex borders agency, is due to commence on November 1 but has a ‘very different’ objective from Mare Nostrum.

Frontex spokeswoman Isabella Cooper told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: ‘Our operation covers a very specific operational area and we only have a few vessels and a few aircraft. The Mediterranean Sea is over 2.5 million square kilometres large – it is virtually impossible to have a full overview of what is happening at sea.


‘Our operation is exclusively that of border control. Mare Nostrum is an operation that aims at search and rescue, so these two operations are very different.’

Michael Diedring, secretary-general of the European Council on Refugees, told Today that the EU should fundamentally change its approach to the problem, allowing more NO MORE Muslims to enter legally or illegally.


He said: ‘One of the reasons these people are making the journey is because the policy of the European Union is that there are almost no safe and legal means to access European soil to file an asylum claim, for example. There is only resettlement, and resettlement numbers are quite low, but that is the only legal way. (It should be a lot lower, muslims are destroying Europe)

‘So individuals who are stranded in North Africa, who are fleeing for their lives, who are running from persecution, from war, who have no choice because their homes have been bombed and destroyed, their family members have been killed, they have been raped and tortured and gone through horrendous journeys along the way, the only way that they can attempt to come to Europe is through organised criminals. (Dying at home is better than dying at sea. Stay home)

Lock up your daughters, Italy, here they come

Lock up your daughters, Italy, here they come

‘If Europe allowed a safe and legal way for people to come, they could use the money that they are paying to criminals and they could buy first-class aeroplane tickets to Europe.’ (Just what Europe needs, even MORE muslim parasites, rapists, and criminals)

‘The answer isn’t to build the walls of fortress Europe higher, it’s to provide more safe and legal channels for people to access protection.’ (In your dreams, asswipe)





In JOLLY OL’ FASCIST ENGLAND, you get arrested for saying “I’m not a Muslim” at an airport security check

A pensioner who said ‘I’m not Muslim’ when he was asked to remove his shoes at airport security has spent more than six months facing charges for ‘racism.’ (What ‘race’ is Islam?


UK Daily Mail (h/t Terry D)  Paul Griffith, 75, pictured above , set off the security scanner’s alarm at Stansted airport when travelling to Malaga for a week’s holiday. He removed his shoes as requested, but said: ‘I am not Muslim am I?’ 

A (Muslim?) security guard accused him of racism and called the police, saying he was upset by the remark. ‘One minute I am queuing up to get on a plane and the next I am confronted by two armed policemen.  ‘They said I had used ‘racist’ language and took me to an office in the terminal,’ Mr Griffith said yesterday.


Mr Griffith was allowed to go on his trip but was arrested when he returned. He was charged with causing ‘racially or religiously aggravated harassment, alarm or distress’. ‘When I got back I had to wait six hours before they interviewed me again, arrested me and said that was being charged with causing racially aggravated harassment.

‘I was photographed, had my finger prints taken and they also took a DNA swab from my mouth. ‘Then they said I would have to go to my local police station.  When I went to Colchester police station I was told I had been charged with an offense under the Crime and Disorder Act but that I could accept a caution instead.

"Have a nice flight"

“Of course you don’t have to take the bag off your head, m’am. Have a nice flight”

‘I refused to do that - I had done nothing wrong and I wasn’t going to admit to a criminal charge if I wasn’t guilty of any crime.’ 

Months later he appeared at Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court where he pleaded not guilty to the offence.  The case was adjourned to last Thursday, but with just 24 hours before appearing, the Crown Prosecution Service suddenly dropped the charge due to lack of evidence. 

The retired hairdressing salon owner, from Colchester, Essex, yesterday criticised the police for their heavy-handedness. ‘I have never fallen foul of the law before and the whole affair has been a complete waste of police time, the court’s time, my time as well as taxpayers’ money.

tsa airport security checkpoint arabs midle easterners profiling agents terrorists motivational posters

‘It has been incredibly stressful – all because I asked a question and apparently dared to use the M word.’

Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS East of England, Frank Ferguson said: ‘Following receipt of the evidential file a full review of the evidence took place.

‘In order to successfully prosecute a charge of racially or religiously aggravated disorderly conduct, we first have to show that the language used was threatening or abusive and in these particular circumstances we could not show that to the high criminal standard required.’ 



Muslim hate preacher Anjem Choudary and his jihadist pals praise the coming Islamic caliphate which they promise will soon take over the UK, EU, and US

They hate democracy, but not all the generous welfare benefits provided for them by hardworking British taxpayers. They want to live under the sharia. So why doesn’t the UK send them to one of their 56 Islamic hellholes with no possibility of return? They are advocating the overthrow of the government. Shouldn’t that be considered treason?

Personally, I think they deserve a well-placed bullet between the eyes. 


Christian Convert to Islam from London warns “We will chop off all Westerners’ heads”


ISIS jihadi’s war name is Abu Abdullah al-Britani. He is 20 years old, of Eritrean origin, grew up in London and converted to Islam from Christianity. It is thought he has been fighting in Syria since December 2013. Speaking in the video, Al-Britani threatens the West, dismissing it as “puppets and apostates.”

IB Times  He says: “We are waiting for you in Dabiq. We are waiting for you in Iraq so bring your coalition of unbelievers because unbelievers will not help you. We will take their weaponry as booty and these people will die.”

He vows that ISIS fighters “are willing to lay down our blood on this soil.” He urges the West to send ground troops to Iraq and Syria, promising “we will kill every single soldier.” “We will chop off the heads of the Americans. We will chop off the heads of the French, chop of the heads of whoever you may bring.”

(But not to worry, if you get tired of fighting in Syria, the UK will welcome you back with open arms)


ONLY 50%??? Anti-Muslim ‘hate’ crimes up nearly 50% since Muslims slaughtered British soldier in the street the same way they mutilate animals

In the wake of British soldier Lee Rigby’s savage murder on the streets of London, figures from the Office of National Statistics show that there were 918 religious hate crimes in 2013/14, compared to just 634 the previous year.


LBC  Nationally, there were 2,273 reported cases of a religious hate crime, up 700 on the previous year. 

Statisticians believe the rise is driven by higher levels of hate crime in the wake of the murder of soldier Lee Rigby.


Fusillier Rigby was murdered by Michael Adebalajo and Michael Adebowale outside Woolwich Barracks in May last year.

John Flatley, from the Office for National Statistics, said: “We’ve seen a small rise in both racial and religiously motivated hate crime in the wake of the Lee Rigby murder.


“It is a backlash effect where people are being victimized possibly because of their Muslim origin.” (Possibly???)

Speaking to LBC, people at the Brick Lane Mosque believes media coverage of ISIL is to blame. They said: “I am not surprised, with so much time given to Muslim extremist groups that you may get a reaction or a backlash which may result in increased attacks on Muslims.”



UK: National Union of Students bans free speech, won’t condemn ISIS terrorist group for fear of being thought of as “Islamophobic”


The National Union of Students has come under fire after it refused to condemn ISIS – because of fears it was ‘Islamophobic.’ Students put forward a motion at the body’s National Executive Council meeting calling for the condemnation of terrorist atrocities and support for the Iraqi people.

UK Daily Mail (h/t Maria J)  But the call was defeated after a rebellion led by Black Students Officer Malia Bouattia, who said the motion was merely a ‘justification for war’. One student, who wished to remain anonymous, said: ‘Islamophobia is a meaningless term used by irrational people when unable to rebut a rational criticism.


‘Malia Bouattia should realise how lucky she is to be able to stand up and express her opinions with freedom and security. ‘She would not enjoy the same freedom if she were to visit the ISIS/ISIL that she refuses to condemn, and protested her opinions.’

Anorak  The Tab reports:

The bill called for the Union – which claims to represent UK students – to support unity between Muslims, condemn the bloody terror of ISIS (also known as the Islamic State), and support a boycott on people who fund the militants. But the motion offended Black Students Officer Malia Bouattia, who said: “We recognize that condemnation of ISIS appears to have become a justification for war and blatant Islamophobia. This rhetoric exacerbates the issue at hand and in essence is a further attack on those we aim to defend.”

ISIS has been beheading a lot of Muslims in the name of Islam. Is that Islamophobic too?

ISIS has been beheading a lot of Muslims in the name of Islam. Is that Islamophobic too?

Students have decreed that some things are unsayable. They are the iliberal moralists. The kids know best. Free speech is not for them. 

Sarah Ditum states:

No platform now uses the pretext of opposing hate speech to justify outrageously dehumanising language, and sets up an ideal of “safe spaces” within which certain individuals can be harassed. A tool that was once intended to protect democracy from undemocratic movements has become a weapon used by the undemocratic against democracy.Not merely false, not something to be robustly opposed, but a position so appalling it simply shouldn’t be heard.

They want ISIS to speak. They won’t condemn. They will debate. Well, not exactly. It turns out that what we took for radicalism is just another attempt to limit the conversation and shout down alternative views.

Birmingham student Bouattia says she plans to put forward another motion in the next meeting to condemn ISIS that “will in no way pander to Western imperialistic intervention or the demonisation of Muslim peoples.”  In doing so we recognize that condemnation of ISIS appears to have become a justification for war and blatant Islamophobia.”

You can just imagine the people trapped in the ISIS surge cheering on the NUS Black Students’ Campaign. Sure the spaced-out loons are going to rape and kill us because of our beliefs and culture, but it’s just terrific that these students are taking care to prevent ‘Islamophobia.’



Did you know that one of Britain’s largest hotel chains has now removed ALL Bibles from its rooms so as not to offend Muslims?

Travelodge removes the Bible from every room: No one had complained… but chain ‘doesn’t want to discriminate.’

UK Daily Mail  (h/t Ann) One of Britain’s biggest hotel chains has removed Bibles from its rooms to avoid upsetting non-Christians. The decision by Travelodge has been condemned as ‘tragic and bizarre’ by the Church of England, which says Bibles in hotel rooms are important to provide hope, comfort and inspiration to travelers.

But the chain, which runs 500 hotels, said the country was becoming increasingly multicultural and it had taken the action for ‘diversity reasons’. A Travelodge spokesman said: ‘The reason is because of diversity. With the country being increasingly multicultural, we didn’t feel it was appropriate to just have the Bible because there are people of other religions.

It said the policy was implemented ‘in order not to discriminate against any religion’ – despite having had no complaints from guests. Bibles were taken away at the same time as a refurbishment of its rooms, removing drawers where they were kept.


The Bibles, which were provided free by the Gideon Society, have been retained and are stored behind reception for guests to borrow on request, the company says. But it seems not all Travelodges even have Bibles available on request. At the branch in Battersea, south London, there was no Bible in the room or behind reception.

When requested, the receptionist could not find a copy and suggested using the hotel’s free wifi to ‘Google it and read it online’. When pushed for a hard copy, he rang his manager who told him they used to have them in rooms, but hadn’t had any at the hotel since refurbishment last year.

But other hotel firms, including Britain’s largest budget hotel company, Premier Inn, and InterContinental Hotels, owners of the Holiday Inn chain, say Bibles are being retained at their hotels. A Premier Inn spokesman said: ‘Bibles are available in Premier Inn rooms.




Oh, BOO HOO, ‘Leading’ professor says Muslim jihadis from the UK who join ISIS are “depressed and lonely and should be allowed to return to Britain without risk of being jailed or punished”

Kamaldeep Bhui, Professor of Cultural Psychiatry and Epidemiology, at Queen Mary University, said that radicalization should be treated as a health issue in the same way as drugs or alcohol abuse.  He has found that those on the path to radicalization are most likely to be educated and come from wealthy families, but feel bored with their lives and socially isolated.

UK jihadi Mohammed El-Araj killed in Syria

UK jihadi Mohammed El-Araj killed in Syria

UK Telegraph (h/t MWP)  And girls are just as likely to start down to path to radicalization as boys.  MI5 has said that there could be as many as 500 British fighters in Syria and dozens of women are believed to have travelled to the country to join Isis or marry jihadists.

One man known as “jihadi John” was filmed beheading American journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff.  But Prof Bhui said that many teenagers were suffering from ‘youthful naivetee’ and were quickly disillusioned after travelling aboard to fight. 

UK jihadis Abdel-Majed Abdel Bary and Aine Davis being investigated as possible ISIS beheaders of Americans and British hostages

UK jihadis Abdel-Majed Abdel Bary and Aine Davis being investigated as possible “jihadi Johnny” ISIS beheaders of Americans and British hostages

He interviewed more than 600 people in Muslim communities in Bradford and London to learn what drives Britons to risk their lives in a foreign country. “Something about them suggests they are disaffected,” he said. 

“The group who sympathized were younger, in full time education and generally wealthy. They were more likely to be depressed and socially isolated.  “There is a bit of youthful naïveté . They have romantic fantasies. They have never experienced sharia law or a caliphate before and they get there and it’s not like they thought.”

Aseel Muthana, pictured here for the first time, is, at the age of 17, believed to be the youngest Briton so far to join Islamist terror networks operating in Syria and Iraq

Aseel Muthana, pictured here for the first time, is, at the age of 17, believed to be the youngest Briton so far to join Islamist terror networks operating in Syria and Iraq

Prof Bhui found that people who expressed sympathy with jihadi or terrorist ideologies were likely to be well-educated, middle class and come from households earning more than £75,000. And women were slightly more likely to become more radicalised than men. 

“We found women were no less likely and they were slightly more likely to have some of those sympathies. There is an increasing epidemic of girls,” he added. 

UK Muslim schoolgirl Yusra Hussien vanished last week and is now thought to be in Turkey preparing to cross the border into Syria

UK Muslim schoolgirl Yusra Hussien vanished last week and is now thought to be in Turkey preparing to cross the border into Syria

Muslim parents have been warned to keep a close eye on their children to pick up signs of depression or loneliness. He warned that youngsters who engaged in fantasy worlds or video games, comics or had online alternative identities were at greater risk. 

David Cameron has said that Britons who travel to Syria or Iraq to join Islamic State (IS) militants will be treated as “an enemy of the UK” and could be stripped of their citizenship. 

UK jihadi Ifthekar Jaman killed in Syria

UK jihadi Ifthekar Jaman killed in Syria

Lat month the Telegraph reported how hundreds of al-Qaeda recruits, including Britons, are being kept in safe houses in southern Turkey, before being smuggled over the border to Syria wage jihad. Two British men are already known to have died in the conflict including Mohammed ‘Mo’ El-Araj, 23, from Notting Hill, in West London.

The Prime Minister is pushing for increased legal powers to monitor suspected extremists and said passports could be removed for people attempting to travel abroad to fight.  But Prof Bhui added: “I think it would be a disaster, you criminalising them and disowning British citizens. Some of these kids are young and probably inexperienced and police in Wales took a different stance. They didn’t want to criminalise. I am happy to work with them.”

UK jihadis Mohamed (L) and Akram (R) Sebah, pictured in Syria shortly before they were killed

UK jihadis Mohamed (L) and Akram (R) Sebah, pictured in Syria shortly before they were killed

Intriguingly, Prof Bhui found that migrants are unlikely to become radicalised because they are poorer, busier struggling to make a living, and they remember the problems of living in non-westernized countries. “They are too busy to form a caliphate. They’ve already experienced adversary,” he added. 

And he said that local imams could be crucial to keeping youngsters on the right path. “A mosque is a protective factor,” he added: “These young people are disconnected from their families, disconnected from origins and when they come into contact, they think they are doing the right thing by connecting in a more orthodox form of Islam. 

“I am suggesting that it’s important to have access to forms of orthodox teaching.” (Oh, right, as if mosques aren’t the major source of radicalization in the UK)

2014_09_05_Jihadists_say_let_us_come_home_London Times


Hey UK! Is this one of the “thousands of Muslim terrorist suspects you are monitoring?”

Or does he get a pass, like all the other Muslim hate preachers/parasites, who are traitors to your country? From the UK, Abu Baraa, expresses joy over ISIS and the emerging Islamic Caliphate especially because “We can start having slave girls again!”



UK teacher suspended after posting ‘racist’ messages about Muslims on Facebook (What ‘race’ is Islam?)


Not only were his messages NOT racist, they were the truth, which is now banned in Britain if it’s about muslims. British Sports instructor Jonathan Parker was sent home from Washwood Heath Academy in Birmingham after it is alleged he wrote messages on social media such as, ‘Muslims cause paedophilia’ and  ‘Sainsbury has run out of pork chops. I blame the Muslims. Vote UKIP.

UK Mirror  Washwood Heath, one of 21 school at the heart of the Trojan Horse enquiry over claims Muslim hardliners had infiltrated some Birmingham schools, suspended Mr Parker.

It is understood he claims the private posts were not genuinely held beliefs and were mockingly racist in tone and aimed at UKIP, the Birmingham Mail reported.


Senior bosses took immediate action after the messages were brought to their attention by concerned pupils attending the 1,400-pupil school which caters for predominantly Muslim children.

Other messages said: “Bloody tax dodging immigrants. If they paid their own way we’d have more money for health, education, public services and pensions. Right I’m off for a STARBUCKS. Vote UKIP.”


Another read: “Halal meat used in curry houses up and down the country! Hands off our national dish! Vote UKIP.”

Mr Parker is a middle achievement leader at the privately-run academy having worked there for approximately five years, and one pupil said: “He’s always been a nice teacher. It’s a big shock to us all. Some pupils are very angry.”


Another message on his Facebook account, now all removed, said: “Bloody kids. Coming out of our women. They should go back to where they came from. Vote UKIP.”

Mr Parker refused to comment last night, but a close friend said: “The messages were to friends only and were satirical, made at the time of the European elections last May, directed against UKIP by sending up the anti- Islamic aspects of their campaign. The posts were gained illegally and doctored to appear out of context and offensive.”


Washwood Heath, whose former pupils include ex-Villa stars Lee Hendrie and Ian Taylor, is still examining the messages, and Mr Parker remains suspended one month into the new academic year.

A spokesman from the trustees of Washwood Heath Academy said: “We can confirm that a member of staff has been suspended. Investigations are ongoing and it would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage.”



EXPOSED: Jihadi kidnap and murder handbook… and plan to infiltrate British Army and police


The 268-page manual is called ‘The Management Of Savagery.’ So why are we considered “Islamophobic” when we refer to these Muslim jihadists savages?

UK Daily Mail  Islamic jihadists are planning to infiltrate Britain’s Army and police forces to carry out brutal attacks, a chilling manifesto for terror used by Islamic State (IS) reveals. The jihadi manual explains how the atrocities committed in the Middle East – including the brutal murders of British hostages David Haines and Alan Henning – are part of a wider strategy that includes plans to wreak mayhem in the UK.


The development comes after security sources revealed yesterday that thousands of terror suspects are being monitored in the UK. The Association of Chief Police Officers has also warned police officers about their personal safety in light of the threat from IS.

Neither the Metropolitan Police nor the Ministry of Defence were willing last night to discuss the security procedures in place.



The 268-page terrorism guide called The Management Of Savagery reveals IS’s intention to:

  • Target tourists at locations across the Islamic world

  • Exploit the propaganda value of targeting Western journalists, and to try to capture oil workers

  • Strike the same strategic targets repeatedly in a bid to expose weaknesses in Western security.

The handbook also revealed that infiltration operations have been going on for years – meaning that a sleeper cell may already have get inside the MoD or a police force.

MoS2 Template Master

Written by influential jihadi Abu Bakr Naji, the guide has been carefully studied by the terrorist commanders in Syria and Iraq, who he tells: ‘Our battle is long and still in its beginning… However, its length provides an opportunity for infiltrating the adversaries. [We] should infiltrate the police forces, the armies, private security companies, sensitive civil institutions.’ 

He added that there were ‘exuberant youth in large numbers seeking jihad. Their desire for martyrdom indicates a proper condition of faith; all that is required is instructional polishing within the movement. It is possible to divert some of them to work in the security apparatus for infiltrating institutions.’


The template for terrorism states that the method chosen to kill hostages should maximise shock value in the West.

In a section titled Blazing Battle, Bakr Naji writes: ‘We must make this battle very violent, such that death is a heartbeat away, so that the two groups will realise that entering this battle will frequently lead to death. 


‘The increase in savagery is not the worst thing that can happen now. Rather, the most abominable of the levels of savagery is [still] less than stability under the order of unbelief. Our enemies will not be merciful to us if they seize us. Thus, it behoves us to make them think one thousand times before attacking us.


‘The policy of violence must also be followed such that if the demands are not met, the hostages should be liquidated in a terrifying manner, which will send fear into the hearts of the enemy and his supporters.’

Experts said last night that the Management Of Savagery, which was apparently first published in 2004, is a ‘relevant document’ and that the actions it expects jihadis to follow are realistic.


‘Everything in the book is possible,’ said Afzal Ashraf, an IS expert at the Royal United Services Institute in London. ‘But obviously they would find it more difficult to infiltrate the Army and police in Britain than they found in Iraq, where much of these institutions simply morphed into IS.


‘The Management Of Savagery is a book for IS’s thinkers but less so the doers. Islamic State has also miscalculated – it thought that extreme violence would deter the West. In fact IS’s enemies have been emboldened to take action.’


The Management Of Savagery claims that the overwhelming military superiority of the United States and the UK has no value without the cohesion of each society and the support for action in the region. 

As IS are convinced that this cohesion does not exist, they believe they can persuade Western powers to retreat if they show how they are prepared to use the most gruesome tactics.