Influential Muslim cleric makes veiled threats that unless Quebec passes Anti-Blasphemy Bill 59 the way he wants it, there will be hell to pay.“
Ledevoir (h/t Susan K) The current draft of Bill 59 gives the Court of Human Rights the right to impose a fine of $ 1,000 to $ 20,000 to anyone promoting hate speech and inciting violence against a group of persons protected by the Article 10 of the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms – women, homosexuals, visible minorities, religious groups, etc.
However, Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard wants the scope of the bill 59 to be amended so that it ONLY prohibits speech where there is a “direct call to violence.” “The purpose is not to reduce the freedom of expression in Quebec. We can talk nonsense. We can say all sorts of offensive things, but we can not call to violence.“
Salem Elmenyawi considers that the denigration of religion and prophets is a personal attack against the Muslims, and that the prohibition of denigration prevents the radicalization of young Muslims. In other words, it calls for freedom of expression in Quebec to be ruled by the Sharia.
Imam Salam Elmenyawi, representative of the Muslim Council of Montreal, in video below, urged the Minister of Justice, Stéphanie Vallée, to make Bill 59 a an anti-blasphemy bill, “which would punish anyone ridiculing religion.“ (But of course, everyone knows he’s only talking about the Islamic religion) “You can insult me, but do not insult my religion,” Elmenyawi told a parliamentary committee.
The bill is “totally incompatible with the foundations of a free and democratic society,” argued the spokesman of Lawyers for the defense of equality and fundamental freedoms, Julius Grey and Julie Latour, in the National Assembly.
Bill 59 will thus be amended to clarify “ demarcation “Between the acceptable and the unacceptable, the permit and prohibited.” It must be explicit and defined. The line for me is direct call to violence “Has he said, trying to allay the concerns of advocates of freedom of expression.”
In addition, Mr. Couillard has brushed aside the hand application of Imam Salam Elmenyawi to review Bill 59 to make it illegal to make fun of religion. “ Of course we can make fun of religions “He said.
Obviously this Muslim does not understand that freedom of expression includes the right to say offensive things about any religion, EVEN Islam.
h/t Vlad Tepes
In other words, poor or elderly or disabled Canadians cannot get subsidized housing in buildings designated as “Muslim-Only,” even if there are vacant apartments.
ORIGINAL STORY: canadastan-handicapped-toronto-man-denied-subsidized-housing-because-he-is-not-a-muslim
The Rebel Right now, there are 91,000 people on the city’s waiting list, but only Muslims are allowed to live a particular building. It’s the first sharia ghetto in Canada, paid for by your tax dollars. CLICK HERE to SIGN OUR PETITION telling Mayor John Tory and City Council that publicly funded segregated housing has no place in Toronto!
ITALY: Newly arrived Muslim invaders (No, they are NOT refugees) are rioting in the streets of Milan and fighting with police because they don’t much like their temporary living conditions and are angry they haven’t been given the kind of food they demanded – hamburgers and pizza. Alessandro Morelli, local councillor for the Northern League in Milan, posted a video (below) showing the wild-eyed savages in action.
MUSLIM invaders who illegally are flooding Italy, moan and riot over ‘poor living conditions’
DMF In the video, one of the angry freeloaders complains, “We asked several times for better food.” “We complained hundreds of times, the food they are giving us here you wouldn’t even give to a ‘whore.'”
“For example, several times we asked for but never received pizza or a hamburger.” “The bread is hard. It’s not good. The menu needs to be redone completely. If I went to a restaurant with some friends, we would definitely eat better than we eat here.”
Muslims get impatient waiting for their documents so they can go to EU countries with better benefits than Italy offers
DMF More and more of these hotel protest stories, in which asylum seekers invaders stage some protest about the quality of the hotel they are lodged in at taxpayer expense. Perhaps Italy should put them up in fancy hotels like the one below instead?
Usually this is something absurdly trivial and almost invariably the story ends with the local authorities offering the invaders some other arrangement more to their liking.
Although the phenomenon is not particularly important in itself, it’s a good indication of the extraordinary sense of entitlement the invaders have, one that has been cultivated by the deranged compassionism of our ruling class.
Some Africans transferred from Sicily to Tuscany and headed for Livorno have got into a bother because they did not appreciate the Hotel Campiglia Marittima. The motives for the protest. There are many and rather fantastical. Notably their objection to the presence of married women in the hotel.
A virtual tidal wave illegal aliens from N. Africa wash up onto Italy’s shore everyday
On getting out of the bus, the illegal invaders – all young men aged between 20 and 25 from North Africa – immediately started to protest their accommodations. Among their complaints is having to stay in a hotel where married women are present, Islam does not allow this kind of proximity.
Muslims are turning the streets of Milan into NO GO areas for non-Muslims
But what also bothers the Africans is the logistical aggravation and their living space: “We don’t have enough space to cook on our own.” Something they were apparently used to having when they were in Sicily.
CLICK SCREEN TWICE TO SEE VIDEO
A leader of France’s top Muslim organization is condemning a court decision that would jeopardize a decades-old policy in which public schools offer substitutes for pork when the meat turns up on lunch menus. (Oh, Noes! Will Muslim children be forced to bring a bag lunch to school now? Will the taxpaying French public have to fund that, too?)
Arab News (h/t Robert S) Abdullah Zekri of the French Council of the Muslim Faith said Thursday he is worried that the ruling a day earlier in eastern Dijon could sow discord with Muslims in France — a country that in recent years has struggled to find a balance between its secular principles and its respect for religious beliefs.
A legal defense team for Muslims had sought to block application of an order earlier this year by Gilles Platret, the conservative mayor of nearby Chalons-sur-Saone, to pull pork substitutes from school menus. Such substitutes are offered across France, in addition to vegetarian alternatives.
Lawyers on both sides said the ruling was not final, and was based more on procedural grounds than a full debate on the issue. But on Twitter, Platret called the ruling a victory for secularism in France. Many French defend a strict separation of religion and state as laid out in a 1905 law to guarantee secularism. Philippe Petit, a lawyer for Chalons-sur-Saone, said on BFM-TV that religion “stops at the (public) school door.”
A few years ago, in March of the Pigs, dozens of French citizens wearing pig masks (below) protested ‘Quick’ fast food chain after it announced that all of its food would be sharia-compliant halal food.
The law has underpinned moves by recent French governments to pass bans on face-covering Muslim veils as well as headscarves, Jewish skullcaps and overly visible Christian crosses in public schools.
France is home to western Europe’s largest Muslim population, estimated at more than 5 million people. Like observant Jews, observant Muslims don’t eat pork. (But unlike Muslims, observant Jews aren’t throwing a hissy fit over it)
Zekri, who also heads the National Observatory Against Islamophobia, called the mayor’s order a provocation that could lead students to inspect each other’s plates and serve as “a factor for conflict.”
Some comments under the article:
“Pork should be banned globally. What Quran says about pork is absolutely true. Apart from Quran few other religious books also talks against pork. it should not be consumed.”
“So much for freedom of speech, France is restricting even freedom to wear and freedom to eat.”