“Statistically speaking, one in four Swedish women will be raped by a Muslim…and every one of them can thank a progressive journalist.”
PAT CONDELL: Progressives are not liberal, progressives are ‘halal’ (approved by Islam)
Category Archives: Just the Facts
Boston Marathon Bombing: Why the Saudi ‘person of interest’ that the media says no longer is a person of interest…actually should be
According to Walid Shoebat, the Saudi national who was under guard in a Boston hospital but isn’t anymore, has several ties to al-Qaeda.
SHOEBAT A couple of weeks ago we warned America about the very serious problem of Saudi infiltration; many of these Saudi nationals criminals and terrorists.
After the bombings, a Saudi by the name of Abdul Rahman Ali Al-Harbi was hospitalized and became a ‘suspect’, then a ‘person of interest’. His apartment was searched by federal and local authorities. No confirmation has been given so far to his involvement. The Media were quick to claim his innocence, of course.
Abdulrhman Ali Al-harbi seen in a Facebook posting.
This brings us to the Boston marathon bombings. Foreign Policy is reporting that he’s ‘no longer a person of interest’, which means he’s “innocent”, right?
Perhaps a quick look at the Arabic sources should raise the eyebrows of every American relative to the extent of the problem at hand. Many from Al-Harbi’s clan are steeped in terrorism and are members of Al-Qaeda. Out of a list of 85 terrorists listed by the Saudi government shows several of Al-Harbi clan to have been active fighters in Al-Qaeda:
#15 Badr Saud Uwaid Al-Awufi Al-Harbi
#73 Muhammad Atiq Uwaid Al-Awufi Al-Harbi
#26 Khalid Salim Uwaid Al-Lahibi Al-Harbi
#29 Raed Abdullah Salem Al-Thahiri Al-Harbi
#43 Abdullah Abdul Rahman Muhammad Al-Harbi (leader)
#60 Fayez Ghuneim Humeid Al-Hijri Al-Harbi
Source: http://aalhameed1.net/vb/showthread.php?t=1565
Then you have Al-Harbi clan members in Gitmo:
Salim Salman Awadallah Al-Sai’di Al-HarbiMajid Abdullah Hussein Al-HarbiMuhammad Abdullah Saqr Al-Alawi Al-HarbiGhanem Abdul Rahman Ghanem Al-HarbiMuhammad Atiq Uwaid Al-Awfi Al-Harbi
Source: http://www.muslm.net/vb/showthread.php?169019-أسماء-(90)-سعودياً-لا-زالوا-محتجزين-في-جوانتانامو
There are specific Saudi clans that are rife with members of Al-Qaeda, which makes it quite alarming as to why nearly a hundred thousand student visas are issued to these. Americans are clueless as to clan ties when it comes to terrorism.
Lesson one: Terrorism and crime by the Saudis is interlinked extensively within families, as we see in the Harbi clan.
Abdulrhman Ali Al-harbi with the pipe in his hand
Let me explain. Americans will never find the Kaczynski Clan official website supporting Ted Kaczynski.
Saudi Arabia is a far different story.
Take Khalid Aldawsari, a Saudi national. He is a student and an Al-Qaeda terrorist who planned to use weapons of mass destruction in the U.S., to include an attempted assassination of president Bush. Aldawsari was not a lone wolf; he was backed by an entire system. The wealthy and powerful Aldawsari clan, which includes the powerful Sheik Saud Bin Mut’ab who hosted a support group for the terrorist defending him publicly while funding his legal team.
Just translate “We are all Khalid Dawsari” into Arabic and see how much support the terrorist gets. The Aldawsari clan’s main website (alduwasser.net) keeps track of everything that goes with every comment in support for the terrorist linking to other supporting groups.
There are several “Aldawsari” troublemakers. Mohammad al-Wada’ani Aldawsari openly calls for the removal of the Saudi Kingdom and Khalid Aldawsari does not mind relying on the help of his enemies, stating (see page 10) that he was admitted into the United States with the help of what he termed “the traitor of the two holy places”. This would be a reference to the King of Saudi Arabia himself, which sends a hundred thousand of his students to the United States, Aldawsari’s favorite target.
Counter the Racist Leftists’ campaign to get Eric Rush fired from FOX News
People for the American Way are petitioning FOX News to dump Eric Rush for an exchange he had on Twitter yesterday following the Boston Marathon Bombings:
PFAW are obviously racist and want him fired because he is a black conservative. They have posted petitions calling for Eric’s immediate dismissal along with the statement below:
(H/T Dawn) Frequent Fox News contributor Erik Rush got into a Twitter exchange shortly after yesterday’s apparent bombing to declare of Muslims: “Yes, they’re evil. Let’s kill them all.”
Rush is only one of many right-wing commentators to jump to the immediate conclusion that the tragic explosions at the Boston Marathon were the result of Islamic terrorism, but his “Kill them all” comment is so far over the line that Fox must distance itself from Rush’s violent bigotry.
Erik Rush is a WorldNetDaily columnist and, frankly, this is the kind of thing one would expect from a prominent voice on that site, which is a festering cesspool of right-wing bigotry and fringe conspiracy theories. But Fox News, albeit known for its right-wing bent, is a major news outlet and when it gives a podium to a hatemonger like Rush it legitimizes him and his views.
While the First Amendment protects Rush’s right to spout whatever venomous hate speech he wants, it doesn’t guarantee him a spot on a major news network. Rush has a right to say what he wants, but the public has the right to be outraged and demand action from one of his outlets
Here are several Contact numbers and addresses at FOX News. Please send your support for Eric.
-
Email: Send a message to foxnewstips@foxnews.com
-
Twitter: “Tweet” at our main @foxnews account
MALI: French President gifted with a replacement camel after the first one was eaten by Muslim savages
Malian authorities are set to give French President François Hollande a new camel after the first one he was given as thanks for France’s military intervention in Mali was killed and eaten by the family who was meant to look after it in Timbuktu.
France 24 (h/t Frederic F) Malian authorities are set to give the French leader an even better dromedary to replace the one that was devoured. “As soon as we heard of this, we quickly replaced it with a bigger and better-looking camel,” said a local government official, quoted by the Reuters news agency. “The new camel will be sent to Paris. We are ashamed of what happened to the camel. It was a present that did not deserve this fate.”
HALAL (ISLAMIC) CAMEL SLAUGHTER: WARNING: EXTREME ANIMAL SUFFERING
REST IN PEACE MARGARET THATCHER
“The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.” — Margaret Thatcher
Her spokesman Lord Bell revealed the news that the former politician had passed away peacefully after a long battle with poor health. Lord Bell said: ‘It is with great sadness that Mark and Carol Thatcher announced that their mother Baroness Thatcher died peacefully following a stroke this morning’. Britain’s first and only woman prime minister, who won three consecutive general elections, has been in fragile health since she suffered a series of minor strokes years ago.
PAT CONDELL is offended by Islam. Who knew?
I used to be offended by Islam for its violent, misogynistic, racist, bigoted, supremacist ideology, but now I am just offended by Muslims because without Muslims, ‘Islam’ would be nothing more than an obscure, archaic, 7th Century word. –BNI
Muslim countries facing growing obesity problem…even the “starving” Palestinians
Not only are the United Arab Emirates facing this problem but obesity is becoming a problem all over the Middle East and other non-Arab Muslim countries. Ten out of the top twelve countries with an obesity problem per capita are Muslim countries for both women and men.
Dubai, in the United Arab Emirates, is known for its social scene which is centered around eating out, with American sized portions, Friday brunches, and fast food culture. However, because of their sedentary lifestyle, not to mention women forced to endure the extreme heat dressed in big black garbage bags, there is a growing concern over the UAE’s obesity epidemic. And not only in the UAE, see chart below.
ATHEISTS: Unlikely allies in the war against Islam
Why is it a surprise that atheists are vehemently anti-Islam now? Because the vast majority of atheists are also leftists, and leftists are among the most ardent Islamofascist apologists and sympathizers. Apparently, the far leftists at Salon are spitting mad as they expose this new category of “ISLAMOPHOBES!“
Leftists have always been admirers of the well-known intellectual atheists – Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and the late Christopher Hitchens – proudly showcasing their rants against Christianity at every opportunity. But now that these atheists have hopped on the growing anti-Islam bandwagon, the leftists are seething with venom and vitriol.
SALON The power of these New Atheists,’ as they are called, is in their ability to reach popular audiences and move their geeky discussions from lecture halls and libraries (Harris has a degree in philosophy from Stanford and a Ph.D in neuroscience from UCLA) to the sets of “The Daily Show” and “The Colbert Report,” where hipsters and yuppies alike digest their sardonic sound bites, repeating them to their online networks in 140 characters or less.
Though Dawkins, Harris and company have been around for years, their presence on the public scene used to be more muted. An atheist then was something you simply were. It wasn’t a full-time career. But in 2001 a man named Mohammed Atta and his Middle Eastern comrades decided to fly jetliners into the Twin Towers and everything changed.
Four days after the attacks, Dawkins could barely contain his intellectual triumphalism. “Those people [the terrorists] were not mindless and they were certainly not cowards,” he wrote in the Guardian. “On the contrary, they had sufficiently effective minds braced with an insane courage, and it would pay us mightily to understand where that courage came from. It came from religion. Religion is also, of course, the underlying source of the divisiveness in the Middle East, which motivated the use of this deadly weapon in the first place.”
Haven’t read Koran so couldn’t quote chapter & verse like I can for Bible. But often say Islam greatest force for evil today.
A few days later, on March 25, there was this:
Until 9/11, Islam didn’t figure in the New Atheists’ attacks in a prominent way. As a phenomenon with its roots in Europe, atheism has traditionally been the archenemy of Christianity, though Jews and Judaism have also slipped into the mix. But emboldened by their newfound fervor in the wake of the terrorist attacks, the New Atheists joined a growing chorus of Muslim-haters, mixing their abhorrence of religion in general with a specific distaste for Islam (In 2009, Hitchens published a book called “God Is Not Great,” a direct smack at Muslims who commonly recite the Arabic refrain Allah Akbar, meaning “God is great”).
Conversations about the practical impossibility of God’s existence and the science-based irrationality of an afterlife slid seamlessly into xenophobia over Muslim immigration or the practice of veiling. The New Atheists became the new Islamophobes, their invectives against Muslims resembling the rowdy, uneducated ramblings of backwoods ‘racists’ (What ‘race’ is Islam?) rather than appraisals based on intellect, rationality and reason. “Islam, more than any other religion human beings have devised, has all the makings of a thoroughgoing cult of death,” writes Harris, whose nonprofit foundation Project Reason ironically aims to “erode the influence of bigotry in our world.”
For Harris, the ankle-biter version of the Rottweiler Dawkins, suicide bombers and terrorists are not aberrations. They are the norm. They have not distorted their faith by interpreting it wrongly. They have lived out their faith by understanding it rightly. “The idea that Islam is a ‘peaceful religion hijacked by extremists’ is a fantasy, and is now a particularly dangerous fantasy for Muslims to indulge,” he writes in “Letter to a Christian Nation.”
That may sound like the ‘psychobabble’ of Pamela Geller. But Harris’s crude departure from scholarly decorum is at least peppered with references to the Quran, a book he cites time and again, before suggesting it be “flushed down the toilet without fear of violent reprisal.”
It’s an extraordinary feat for an Oxford scholar to admit that he hasn’t done the research to substantiate his belief, but what’s more extraordinary is that he continues to believe the unsupported claim. That backwards equation — insisting on a conclusion before even launching an initial investigation — defines the New Atheists’ approach to Islam.
That’s topsy-turvy logic for a man who says he’s never read the Quran but seconds later hocks up gems like this from his Twitter account:
Islam is comforting? Tell that to a woman, dressed in a binbag, her testimony worth half a man’s and needing 4 male witnesses to prove rape
Then there was this:
Next gem from BBC Idiot Zoo: ‘Some women feel “protected” by the niqab.’
Dawkins’ quest to “liberate” Muslim women and smack them with a big ol’ heaping dose of George W. Bush freedom caused him to go berzerk over news that a University College of London debate, hosted by an Islamic group, offered a separate seating option for conservative, practicing Muslims. Without researching the facts, Dawkins assumed that gendered seating was compulsory, not voluntary, and quickly fired off this about the “gender apartheid” of the supposedly suppressed Muslims:
At UC London debate between a Muslim and Lawrence Krauss, males & females had to sit separately. Krauss threatened to leave
@LKrauss1
And then this:
Sexual apartheid. Maybe these odious religious thugs will get their come-uppance? http://bit.ly/XiOB0h http://bit.ly/10uWhcF
Where exactly Dawkins gets his information about Islam is unclear – perhaps Fox News? What is clear, though, is that his unique brand of secular fundamentalism cozies up next to that screeched out by bloggers on the pages of some of the Web’s most vicious anti-Muslim hate sites.
In a recent comment he posted on his own Web site, Dawkins references a site called Islam Watch, placing him in eerily close proximity to the likes of one of the page’s founders, Ali Sina, an activist who describes himself as “probably the biggest anti-Islam person alive.” Sina is a board member for the hate group, Stop the Islamization of Nations, which was founded by anti-Muslim activists Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer and which has designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Dawkins is also on record praising the far-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders, a man who says that he “hates Islam” and that Muslims who desire to remain in the Netherlands should “rip out half of the Koran.” Later, he blabbed that the Muslim holy book should be banned entirely.
The Dutch leader of the Party of Freedom, who faced trial in 2009 for hate speech (and was acquitted), produced a flick called “Fitna” the year before. The 17-minute film was chockablock with ‘racist’ (What race is Islam?) images such as Muhammad’s head attached to a ticking time bomb and juxtapositions of Muslims and Nazis. For Dawkins, it was pure bliss. “On the strength of ‘Fitna’ alone, I salute you as a man of courage who has the balls to stand up to a monstrous enemy,” he wrote.
When it comes to ripping pages out of books, Dawkins is a pro. His rhetoric on Muslims comes nearly verbatim from the playbook of the British Nationalist Party and other far right groups in the UK. BNP leader Nick Griffin once told a group in West Yorkshire that Islam was a “wicked and vicious faith” and that Asian Muslims were turning Old Blighty into a multiracial purgatory.
For his part, Dawkins spins wild conspiracy theories claiming that ordinary terms like “communities” and “multiculturalism” are actually ominous code words for “Muslims” and “Islam,” respectively.
The English Defence League, a soccer hooligan street gang that has a history of threatening Muslims with violence and assaulting police officers, has made identical claims, as have leaders of Stop the Islamization of Europe (SIOE), a ragtag coterie of neo-Nazis whose hate franchise spans two continents: Stop the Islamization of America (SIOA), its American counterpart, is led by bloggers Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer. In July of 2011, Dawkins re-published a lengthy diatribe by former SIOE leader Stephen Gash on his website.
Dawkins has no monopoly on intellectual flimsiness, though. As does the teacher so does the student. And Harris is every bit the Dawkins student. In “The End of Faith,” Harris maintains that Israel — the untouchable, can-do-no-evil love of so many Islamophobes — upholds the human rights of Palestinians to a high standard.
The Israelis have shown a degree of restraint in their use of violence that the Nazis never contemplated and that, more to the point, no Muslim society would contemplate today. Ask yourself, what are the chances that the Palestinians would show the same restraint in killing Jews if the Jews were a powerless minority living under their occupation and disposed to acts of suicidal terrorism? It would be no more likely than Muhammad’s flying to heaven on a winged horse.
How the New Atheists’ anti-Muslim hate advances their belief that God does not exist is not exactly clear. In this climate of increased anti-Muslim sentiment, it’s a convenient digression, though. They’ve shifted their base and instead of simply trying to convince people that God is a myth, they’ve embraced the monster increasingly popular narrative of the day. That’s not rational or enlightening or “free thinking” or even intelligent. That’s opportunism.
If atheism writ large was a tough sell to skeptics, the “New Atheism,” Muslim-bashing atheism, must be like selling Bibles to believers. After all, those who are convinced that God exists, and would otherwise dismiss the Dawkins’ and Harris’s of the world as hell-bound kooks, are often some of the biggest Islamophobes. It’s symbiosis — and as a biologist, Dawkins should know a thing or two about that. Proving that a religion — any religion — is evil, though, is just as pointless and impossible an endeavor as trying to prove that God does or doesn’t exist. Neither has been accomplished yet. And neither will.
Time to set the record straight on one of the most popular Muslim lies
Muslims keep trying to convince ‘unbelievers’ that Islam teaches that whoever kills an innocent, it is as if he has killed all mankind; and whoever saves one person, it is as if he has saved all mankind.
Islam Watch That sound pretty good. The problem is that it is not a teaching of Muhammad. It is a quote from Judaic scriptures.
“Whoever destroys a soul, it is considered as if he destroyed an entire world. And whoever saves a life, it is considered as if he saved an entire world.” Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin 4:1.
This quote is taken from verse 5:32 of the Quran. Let us first quote the full verse and see what it says:
“[005:032] On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person – unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land – it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land.”
The first thing to note is that, the command (allegedly of Allah) applies to the “Children of Israel” (Jews). It does NOT apply to Muslims. Secondly, the verse does not use the word “innocent” anywhere, in any translation, which you can see at this link from Islamist site.
Thirdly, a person can be slain for (i) murder or (ii) for spreading mischief in the land. Now what is spreading mischief in the land? The next verse 5:33 says:
The punishment for those who wage war against God and His Apostle, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter.
Quran 7:103: Then after them We sent Moses with Our signs to Pharaoh and his chiefs, but they wrongfully rejected them: So see what was the end of those who made mischief. [So rejecting the prophet/not converting to Islam is “mischief” and non-Muslims can be put to death]
Muhammad is quoting a biblical fable. How can Muslims claim credit for it? The problem does not end there. Talmud is not considered to be the word of God. It is the recorded teachings of Sanhedrin, the high council of rabbis.
So why Allah says “WE prescribed for the Children of Israel…”? The god of the Quran is claiming ownership of something he never said. This leaves us with few options.
1- Allah has plagiarized the teachings of the Rabbis.
2- He was confused and had forgotten that those words were not his.
3- This verse is not from God. Muhammad admitted that sometimes Satan came and whispered some verses to him that he thought were from God. Could this verse be one of those satanic verses?
4- Muhammad lied. The Quran is not the word of God.
H/T ComedyStandUps
Thanks to Roger Ailes, FOX News chief, people know the sinister truth about Islam unreported by the MSM
And the Left Wing Fascists have their panties in a wad over it as George Soros-funded ‘Media Matters’ shouts: “Upcoming Ailes Biography reveals Fox’s ‘Islamophobia’ goes straight to the top.”
Media Matters In an upcoming biography of Fox News president Roger Ailes, author Zev Chafets reports that Ailes hasn’t donated to any Muslim charities, and connects that decision to comments tying all Muslim charities to terrorism. Ailes’ brand of Islamophobia is mirrored in Fox News’ coverage, which has repeatedly tried to connect all Muslims and Muslim institutions with terrorism.
In his new book Roger Ailes: Off Camera, an early copy of which was obtained by Media Matters, Chafets describes Ailes’ charitable giving as being spread among a variety of religious charities. Despite giving to charities of various faiths, Chafets reported that Ailes has not given to any Muslim charities, quoting Ailes as saying he would only support those organizations “if they disarm.”
He donates upward of 10 percent of his net income to charities, many of them religious, including an annual fifty grand to the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York and another fifty grand to Catholic charities. He told me he’d be glad to give to Muslim charities, too, “if they disarm.”
The implication that all Muslim charities are connected to terrorism is in line with the Islamophobic rhetoric that regularly appears on Fox News. Fox hosts and guests have a long history of invoking terrorism to attack Muslims and Islam:
-
In an appearance on ABC’s The View, Fox host Bill O’Reilly declared ”Muslims killed us on 9-11.” O’Reilly used the claim to justify his opposition to a planned Islamic community center located two blocks away from New York City’s Ground Zero. O’Reilly later said, “If anybody felt I was demeaning all Muslims, I apologize.”
-
Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade defended O’Reilly’s statement by saying ”there was a certain group of people that attacked us on 9-11. It wasn’t just one person. It was one religion. Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims.” On his radio show later in the day, Kilmeade asserted that it’s a “fact” that “every terrorist is a Muslim.” Following widespread criticism of his remarks, Kilmeade“clarified” his comments, saying “I’m sorry about that, if I offended … or hurt anybody’s feelings. But that’s it. 
-
On The O’Reilly Factor, regular Fox guest Ann Coulter& advocated racial profiling by claiming terrorists “all look alike. They’re all foreign-born … They’re all Muslim.”
-
On The Five, co-host Eric Bolling falsely claimed “every terrorist on American soil has been a Muslim.
-
In a months-long attack on the proposed Islamic community center Park51, Fox News hosts and guests regularly invoked terrorism. Contributor Dick Morris claimed the center would “train the same kind of terrorists that caused the attacks” on 9-11
-
Bolling predicted Park51 “may be a meeting place for some of the scariest minds — some of the biggest terrorist minds.” Kilmeade described the center by saying “the next Hamburg cell could be right downtown,” a reference to the terrorist cell whose members executed the 9-11 hijackings.
Pamela Geller’s outstanding speech on ‘Free Speech’ at Breitbart’s ‘CPAC for the Uninvited’
PAT CONDELL on the Muslim rape jihad against free speech
Pat takes on the Saudi-funded Islamic cultural terrorists otherwise known as the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) and their campaign to make criticism of Islam an international crime.
