Barack Hussein Obama’s declared BFF*, Recep Erdogan, Prime Minister of Turkey, is slowly moving the once secular state toward an increasingly Islamic fundamentalist one.

*BFF – Best Friends Forever

Some children are sad that the little piglets have been removed from an agricultural museum near Gellerupparken in Aarhus Municipality. I wonder if they know they have the Muslim children to thank for that?

 Islam vs Europe  The explanation given was that the pigs were removed because of environmental and animal welfare. But the actual reason is brutal mistreatment of the pigs by Muslim children – typically stoning.

In one case a piglet was killed after children of a different (aka Muslim) ethnic background than Danish had stabbed a piglet with a stick.

‘We protected the pigs’ hut with a fence so they could be left in peace from stones and other objects.’ But the attacks continued, and the pigs have now been removed.’ (Muslims don’t eat pork and are offended by anything that represents a pig)

They were our most popular animals for most visitors. And we were excited to show how the pigs could live a natural life,’ he says and adds that also rabbits, chickens, lambs and sheep have been hurt.”

Not sure where this is. Looks like Sudan or Somalia, but it could be any Muslim country. When Muslim Brotherhood proxy, CAIR, advocates for sharia law in America, this is what they want.

H/T Amil Imani

Maybe the donkey was being punished for turning down the man’s sexual advances?

Even without that Arabic music and writing, you can tell this happened in a Muslim country. BNI posts examples of Muslim animal abuse all the time, starting with barbaric halal slaughter, dog poisonings, cat skinnings, etc.

UPDATE: According to some translated material (h/t Alan K) about this horror story: The video clip is of young Algerians setting fire to the donkey to the tune of Song of Songs “Rai.” Laughter from the boys can be heard.

The Humane Society of Algeria is investigating the case and checking the identity of the boy who burned the donkey alive. Apparently their main concern is not punishment of the boy but of making sure public opinion doesn’t hurt the international reputation of Algeria.

It is noteworthy that Arabs are subjected to severe condemnation in America and Europe because of their brutal treatment of animals, such as from a broadcast of a  young Egyptian man throwing a dog off the top of a building.

h/t Susan K

If you are a Western woman and you get gang raped by Muslims in Dubai, you will go to jail for having illicit sex. And neither the police nor the Australian Embassy will help you, because in Dubai, sharia rules, and women have no rights…especially Western women.

RELATED STORY:

how-sad-on-qantas-airlines-pigs-cant-fly-but-muslims-can

Muslims seem to take pride in slaughtering animals so that they die terrified and in agony,  screaming and writhing in pain for as long as possible. Countries like Australia send their live animals to Muslim countries where there is no such thing as ‘humane’ slaughter.

And before we get the inevitable claims that Kosher is just like Halal…consider this:

Kosher vs. Halal:

Kosher – requires the animal be slaughtered quickly and humanely, strictly forbidding cruel slow methods like strangulation.

Halal – requires the animal be bled out in agony while sick people who get off watching that kind of thing have a “festival.”

Kosher – requires the blood be drained cleanly from the *carcass* of the humanely killed animal, removing toxins released from cells into the bloodstream at the moment of death from the meat.

Halal –leaves the meat *filled* with toxins released at the moment of death because the blood is removed while the animal is dying and therefore is not present in sufficient quantities to remove those last toxins.

Kosher – contains little to no cortisol or norepenepherine (two stress chemicals that are similar enough from mammal to mammal to cross species) because the animal to be killed is treated well before it is put down and is generally not frightened as it is put down (because in a truly kosher slaughter situation, animals cannot be slaughtered in a sequential fashion, as the waste of one could contaminate the next, so they are not exposed to the “scent of death” the way non-kosher culls are)

Halal – animals watch other animals die during the blood letting festival, smelling their fear and raising their own stress. These stress chemicals “marinate” the meat in hormones known to raise levels of aggression and violence in nearly all mammal species (including human).

Kosher – requires cooking the cleanly drained meat completely, cooking any remaining stress chemicals into oblivion.

Halal – allows for a surprising range of cooking methods, including even some “tar tar” dishes (raw or nearly raw), allowing for the spread of disease and chemicals and hormones that were not removed by the idiotic slow bloodletting practice and half-measure cooking.

Kosher – the spinal cord is sectioned thus cutting off pain to the brain. Therefore, no suffering or terror.

Halal – spinal cord left intact.

In the early 1980′s, Kashmir was once the center of film and culture, where spectacular Bollywood motion pictures were produced and movie theaters were everywhere. But with the imposition of Islamic religious intolerance and hatred for all things beautiful and joyous, nearly all the cinemas were forced to close and many were demolished by islamists, who consider movies, music, and entertainment un-Islamic.

Muslims loves to  portray themselves as victims of the “misunderstanders of Islam who are brainwashed by the media.” Don’t buy it. In fact don’t buy anything a Muslim tells you, because they are commanded in the quran to lie to the unbelievers as a non-violent way to support  jihad and its uptimate goal: the Islamization of the entire world.

Think about it. The media always portray Muslims in the best possible light, relegating the more than 20,000 deadly Islamic terror attacks since 9/11 to a teeny tiny minority of “bad” Muslims. The media regularly submit to Muslim demands to restrict free speech, to self-censor themselves, and to redefine words in the way they Muslims demand that they be understoon, not what they really are.  And yet Muslims still blame the media first for all the anti-Muslim sentiment in the world.

That’s because submission to Islam is a form of appeasement and we know what happens when you feed the crocodile, hoping he will eat you last.

This video does a good job showing you what they say, but what they really mean.

You remember Theo Van Gogh, the Dutch filmmaker who was stabbed to death in the street in his own country by a Muslim who was outraged over Van Gogh’s film, ‘Submission’ about the plight of Muslim women.

British journalist and broadcaster, Jeremy Clarkson,  may regret joining the debate on whether burkas should be permitted in Britain in his own inimitable style. The outspoken presenter provoked a flurry of complaints after telling viewers  of  Top Gear on Sunday night that he had seen a Muslim woman wearing sexy underwear beneath her burka.

The problem is that Muslim Brotherhood front groups like CAIR  have infiltratred Wetern governments and are pushing for sharia law to be recognized. American courts have considered sharia law in their rulings at least 50 times already. More than 29 states in America are trying to pass anti-Sharia legislation. Only 6 have – Alabama, Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee.

Personal Liberty  (h/t Frederic F) American leaders’ perennial fantasy that bringing a taste of consumer culture to Mideast countries ripe for occupation will somehow open a floodgate of populist enthusiasm for Beyoncé and constitutional rule isn’t reflected in a new survey that reveals the predominant views of common people in the Muslim world.

The survey, conducted by the Pew Research Center, shows there’d likely be very little wiggle room in any U.S.-led battle for Middle Eastern hearts and minds. Residents of most Muslim nations, in fact, are pretty united in embracing the political, social and religious culture they already know, and don’t seem interested in alternatives.

The survey included face-to-face interviews of nearly 40,000 Muslims and spanned more than 80 languages in Europe, Asia, the Mideast and Africa.

Although the numbers varied by country, the majority of average Muslims surveyed favor a theocratic form of government. Specifically, they favor Sharia law, the moral and religious law of Islam, infallibly delivered by Allah and prescriptive of every facet of personal and public behavior.

To American sensibilities, the life-pervading extent of Sharia — along with the unchallenged and literal carrying out of punishments for violating Islamic code — is repugnant as an expression of government.

But in Muslim countries, Sharia is what most people want, especially as a means of resolving disputes in domestic life. Their approval of Sharia’s “eye-for-eye” sentencing varied much more broadly, however, with more either repudiating the practice or stating they believe it not to be common throughout the majority of the Muslim world.

Homosexuals being hanged for being homosexual in Iran

In the Islamic republic of Afghanistan, 99 percent of those surveyed favor Sharia — presumably over the 2004 Afghan constitution — as the law of the land. Those numbers don’t drop off dramatically elsewhere. The survey reported:

Crucifixion in Yemen

Solid majorities in most of the countries surveyed across the Middle East and North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia favor the establishment of sharia, including 71% of Muslims in Nigeria, 72% in Indonesia, 74% in Egypt and 89% in the Palestinian territories.

While the survey indicates a profound devotion to an Islamic way of life encompassing both the private and public sphere, it also indicates the majority of Muslims distance themselves from what they regard as Islamic extremism and, in fact, consider violent acts perpetrated by Islamic groups a much greater threat than “Christian extremists.”

Unsurprisingly, the Palestinian territories offer an exception: 40 percent of Palestinians surveyed said they support suicide bombings.

But you’d never know it, judging by the pervasive denials by Muslims and Muslim-apologist dhimmis in the government, military, and especially the media.

Starting with 9/11 and right up to the latest Islamic terror attacks in Boston, we’ve been bombarded with denials that Islam had anything to do with the Muslim terrorist bombings by the likes of Hamas front group CAIR and all its Muslim Brotherhood affiliates, not to mention the Muslim-sympathizing TV and Cable networks – all except FOX, George W. Bush, Barack Hussein Obama, Democrat politicians, Homeland Security, and even military brass like the General at Ft. Hood who said “diversity is more important than 13 dead soldiers.”

CounterJihadReport (Daniel Pipes) Over three years after Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan’s massacre at Ft. Hood, Texas, in November 2009, the classification of his crime remains in dispute. In its wisdom, the Department of Defense, supported by law enforcement, politicians, journalists, and academics, deems the killing of thirteen and wounding of forty-three to be “workplace violence.” For example, the 86-page study on preventing a repeat episode, Protecting the Force: Lessons from Fort Hood, mentions “workplace violence” sixteen times.

In contrast, members of congress ridiculed the “workplace violence” characterization and a coalition of 160 victims and family members recently released a video, “The Truth About Fort Hood,” criticizing the administration. On the third anniversary of the massacre, 148 victims and family members sued the U.S. government for avoiding legal and financial responsibility by not acknowledging the incident as terrorism. Indeed, were the subject not morbid, one could be amused by the disagreement over what exactly caused the major to erupt. Speculations included “racism” against him, “harassment he had received as a Muslim,” his “sense of not belonging,” “mental problems,” “emotional problems,” “an inordinate amount of stress,” the “worst nightmare” of his being deployed to Afghanistan, or something fancifully called “pre-traumatic stress disorder.” One newspaper headline, “Mindset of Rogue Major a Mystery,” sums up this bogus state of confusion.

The military leadership willfully ignores what stares them in the face, namely Hasan’s clear and evident Islamist inspiration; Protecting the Force mentions “Muslim” and “jihad” not a single time, and “Islam” only once, in a footnote.[4] The massacre officially still remains unconnected to terrorism or Islam.

This example fits in a larger pattern: The establishment denies that Islamism—a form of Islam that seeks to make Muslims dominant through an extreme, totalistic, and rigid application of Islamic law, the Shari’a—represents the leading global cause of terrorism when it so clearly does. Islamism reverts to medieval norms in its aspiration to create a caliphate that rules humanity. “Islam is the solution” summarizes its doctrine. Islam’s public law can be summarized as elevating Muslim over non-Muslim, male over female, and endorsing the use of force to spread Muslim rule. In recent decades, Islamists (the adherents of this vision of Islam) have established an unparalleled record of terrorism.

To cite one tabulation: TheReligionOfPeace.com counts 20,000 assaults in the name of Islam since 9/11,[5] or about five a day. In the West, terrorist acts inspired by motives other than Islam hardly register.

It is important to document and explain this denial and explore its implications. The examples come predominantly from the United States, though they could come from virtually any Western country—except Israel.

DOCUMENTING DENIAL

The government, press, and academy routinely deny that Islamist motives play a role in two ways, specific and general. Specific acts of violence perpetrated by Muslims lead the authorities publicly, willfully, and defiantly to close their eyes to Islamist motivations and goals. Instead, they point to a range of trivial, one-time, and individualistic motives, often casting the perpetrator as victim. Examples from the years before and after 9/11 include:

• 1990 Muslim assassination of Rabbi Meir Kahane in New York: “A prescription drug for … depression.”[6]
• 1991 Muslim murder of Makin Morcos in Sydney: “A robbery gone wrong.”
• 1993 Muslim murder of Reverend Doug Good in Western Australia: An “unintentional killing.”
• 1993 Muslim attack on foreigners at a hotel in Cairo, killing ten: Insanity.[7]
• 1994 Muslim killing of a Hasidic Jew on the Brooklyn Bridge: “Road rage.”[8]
• 1997 Muslim shooting murder atop the Empire State Building: “Many, many enemies in his mind.”[9]
• 2000 Muslim attack on a bus of Jewish schoolchildren near Paris: A traffic incident.
• 2002 Muslim double murder at El Al terminal at LAX: “A work dispute.”[11]
• 2002 Muslim Beltway snipers: A “stormy [family] relationship.”[12]
• 2003 Muslim Hasan Karim Akbar‘s attack on fellow soldiers, killing two: An “attitude problem.”[13]
• 2003 Muslim mutilation murder of Sebastian Sellam: Mental illness.[14]
• 2004 Muslim explosion in Brescia, Italy outside a McDonald’s restaurant: “Loneliness and depression.”[15]
• 2005 Muslim rampage at a retirement center in Virginia: “A disagreement between the suspect and another staff member.”[16]
• 2006 Muslim murderous rampage at the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle: “An animus toward women.”[17]
• 2006 Muslim killing by SUV in northern California: “His recent, arranged marriage may have made him stressed.”[18]

Silly question, of course they won’t. But you might be able to, see below.

Bangladesh Hindus  Washington, D.C. (April 12, 2013) – ”We want justice, we want justice,” was the chant heard from a crowd of over 300 demonstrators, mostly of Bengali origin, on Wednesday in front of the White House. The rally, organized by the Bangladesh Hindu Buddhist Christian Unity Council (BHBCUC) and the Hindu American Foundation (HAF), urged the United States government to use its influence to stop the rampant persecution of Hindus and other religious minorities in Bangladesh.

Many of the participants spoke of their first hand experience with persecution they endured during Bangladesh’s 1971 war of independence and the ongoing violent campaigns that have occurred since.

“The recent tragedies faced by the Hindu community of Bangladesh are reflective of the violent attacks that we faced in 1971 and again in 2001,” said Sitanghsu Guha, an advisor to BHBCUC. “In a report presented to Congress, Senator Ted Kennedy shed invaluable light on the targeting of Bangladesh’s Hindu community during the country’s 1971 war of independence from Pakistan.

There are details of the tremendous loss of life, hundreds of thousands of women raped, and the nearly ten million people displaced. It is in that spirit that we urge the U.S. government to offer its support to Bangladesh in this critical time. If the U.S. fails to act now, there may be no Hindus left in Bangladesh.”

Protesters arrived in chartered buses from New York, New Jersey, Georgia, and as far as California to join local DC area residents. Recent months have seen a sharp rise in violence perpetrated against Hindus, Buddhists, Ahmadi Muslims, Christians, and atheists in Bangladesh by Islamist groups after the first of three Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI) leaders was convicted for committing war crimes during the country’s 1971 War of Independence from Pakistan. JeI and other groups are widely believed to have instigated the current spate of violence.

“The situation in Bangladesh is getting worse by the day. The demands of the protesters to President Obama and American lawmakers to stop the violence in Bangladesh are urgent for not only the safety of Bangladeshis, but U.S. security interests in the region.” said Jay Kansara, HAF Associate Director. “Bangladesh has witnessed increasing religious fundamentalism for decades to the demise of all its minority communities who have bore the brunt of violent attacks and killings.”

Earlier in the day, a small delegation of leaders from BHBCUC and HAF met with Congressional offices to request a hearing on the persecution of religious minorities in Bangladesh in the House Foreign Affairs Committee and Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission.

The delegation also requested groups perpetrating violence against religious minorities in Bangladesh, like the Jamaat-e-Islami and its affiliates, be put on U.S. designated terrorist lists.