CANADA: Quebec ‘hate speech’ bill would censor people who write against Islam online”

7d7338e88347758b9ef689da4234b84c“We’ve had complaints filed against anti-Muslim websites and we couldn’t accept them. If we have this new provision, which would censor speech that promotes “fear of the other (specifically Muslims),” we could proceed and take action against them.”  Quebec “Human Rights” Commission


National Post  In mid-June, Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard introduced two new bills in the National Assembly. Bill 62 was long anticipated and non-controversial (in Quebec) bill which would shore up ‘religious neutrality but stop short of banning religious garb in public. The other was a bit of a bombshell.

Bill 59 assigns new powers to the Quebec Human Rights Commission (QHRC) to combat hate speech, as well as a variety of other provisions meant to protect against extremism, by censoring speech that promotes “fear of the other.” Ominously, the bill would allow the QHRC to pursue websites that in its estimation describe and denounce Islamism.


The bill takes its inspiration from recommendations made public by the QHRC in November 2014. Jacques Frémont, the commission’s president, explained that he planned to use the requested powers to sue those critical of certain ideas, “people who would write against … the Islamic religion … on a website or on a Facebook page.”

Frémont is an unabashed legal activist, who sees the QHRC’s mandate as “provoking a social change” and “making the law.” (“You will make the law with difficult cases, risky cases,” he said at a March conference at the Université de Montréal.)

In support of such stringent censorship he cites resolutions adopted by UN bodies. But the only UN body pressing for this measure is the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), an Islamist consortium that equates criticism of Islam with hate speech.


The OIC’s member nations have nothing to teach any democratic society in the way of “inclusion,” “openness” and “living together,” all justifications for Bill 59 made by Premier Couillard.

The details of Bill 59 are chilling. Article 6 would “give the QHRC the power to initiate legal proceedings before the Quebec Human Rights Tribunal without having to wait for complaints from the public.” Article 3 allows members of an identifiable group as well as people outside the group to make complaints triggering suits for hate speech before the Quebec Human Rights Tribunal.


If this has a déjà vu quality to it, it should. Bill 59 would pave the same well-travelled road to suppression of speech and opinion that led, via the similar Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, to the infamous pursuit of journalists Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant by Muslim activists determined to stifle normative expressions of opinion. The public’s disgust at such bureaucratic despotism happily led to its repeal at the federal level.

On its face, Bill 59 would seem to be an exercise in futility. The Internet is not a provincial domain. Legal precedence, including a Supreme Court judgment in this area that overturned a previous QRHC victory at the Quebec Human Rights Tribunal (Latif v. Bombardier), confirms the Internet falls under federal jurisdiction.


But we should not underestimate Frémont and his censorship-happy team. Frémont is one of Canada’s top constitutionalists, and if anyone can find a Quebec-exception loophole in what seems to be settled law, it will be him.

Bill 59 is a danger to democracy and should not pass.

“We don’t absolutely make it illegal to talk about certain subjects, we just make it so dangerous, with so many obscure and complex rules that no one dares to go there.  Somewhat like gun laws. We don’t overtly ban all fire arms. No, we would find too much resistance and rational criticism. The hypocritical Canadian way is simply to regulate them out of existence, gradually, just like controversial speech. Hate laws mean whatever we say they mean. We will only tell you after you say something if you have offended. This is the process of gradual Marxism. The state gradually disarms the citizen of their weapons and their free speech by slow degrees so that absolute control both physical and mental will be with the state.”  Freedom Site


ISLAMIC STATE (ISIS) savages force 10 men to kneel atop buried bombs, then blow them up for rejecting Islam

The bloodthirsty ISIS terrorists known for their mass executions and sickening beheading videos have released footage of their latest killing method: death by land mine.


UK Daily Mail  The savage terror group released new video showing their soldiers of Allah burying bombs on an Afghan hillside, forcing prisoners onto their knees and then setting off the hidden explosives.

ISIS savages have burnt men alive and drowned prisoners in metal cages but now ISIS have released a new video showing off their newest method of committing murder.


Filmed in an unknown location in Afghanistan, ISIS militants are shown burying several explosive charges beneath the ground before covering them with earth. 



The ten prisoners are blindfolded and led up to where the bombs have been buried before they are forced to their knees. The bloodthirsty jihadis detonate the charges, killing all the prisoners.  


ll the victims are described as ‘apostates’, according to the ISIS video, which appeared on jihadi social media accounts last night. It is believed the victims are from the Shinwari tribe and were accused of aiding the Taliban in the Afghan province of Nangarhar, where ISIS was recently expelled.


Several of the other victims were also condemned to death for helping the Afghan government counter the longstanding insurgency in the troubled country. 

The video appears heavily co-choreographed with the ISIS fighters riding on horses across the green hills with the early morning fog adding to dramatic effect.


Keen to carry out their horrendous act of brutality, the two new arrivals rush to join the line of militants standing behind the line of prisoners. All ten of the victims are blindfolded with a beige coloured scarf, with several of the victims appearing to be elderly in comparison to their young captors. 


Once ready, the ISIS militants lead their prisoners to where the bombs are buried, dragging their victims by their loose blindfolds.


Several militants are shown putting the final preparations to the bombs, checking the yellow wires are correctly secured before covering up the explosives with earth.

CMCB3TrWsAAPWlcConcealed in the ground beneath their knees, the deadly explosive charges lie in wait, having been carefully wired up by several ISIS militants.


Unknown to the blindfold prisoners, they are made to kneel on the freshly relaid mounts of earth, where the explosives are buried. The two ISIS fighters wait by the prisoners before sprinting away from the line of victims just before the bombs detonate.


The final scenes are too graphic to describe but represent the inhumane brutality of the jihadi organisation, who are continuing to grow in strength in Afghanistan.

ISIS have developed an brutal reputation for their unimaginable levels of cruelty and violence. 


ANOTHER Secular Bangladeshi Blogger hacked to death…the 4th blogger killed this year…for criticizing Islam








IRAQ: Islamic State throws another bound and blindfolded homosexual off a roof as the baying crowd on the ground below laughs and cheers

Children stand among a crowd of laughing men as depraved Islamic State (ISIS) savages throw a man accused of being gay from the top of a building in northern Iraq. Shocking new photographs show the man, who is blindfolded and has his hands tied behind his back, pushed off the top of a silo.


UK Daily Mail It is the latest proof of ISIS’ ambition to hunt down and execute anyone they believe is gay and is unclear how the man’s sexuality was discovered, but a jihadi appears to commentate on the killing using a microphone.

The pictures, tweeted by an ISIS Twitter account, show the victim at the top of the building with three balaclava-clad terrorists before being thrown to his death. His crumpled, motionless body is photographed at the foot of the silo.


The crowd of men and children – some of them smiling and laughing – watch on as the man is brutally murdered in front of them.

The images are just the latest to be released by the terror group. Last month, vile photographs showed a man thought to be gay being thrown to his death in the Iraqi city of Mosul.


And just a few days earlier, pictures of two men being hurled from a building for ‘being gay’ and then stoned to death were released. It is thought the photographs were taken in Homs, Syria.

In previous months, similar demonstrations of depravity were released by ISIS, which imposes strict Sharia law in the vast swathes of territory it controls, on social media.  

No word as to whether or not the crowd stoned him to death as they do when these victims aren’t killed by the impact of the fall.











“So…how are they doing?” Al-Qaeda’s 7-Step Program for Islamic domination was written in 1996

Starting from the “awakening” with the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington in 2001, to the toppling of Arab secular governments beginning in 2010, to the emergence of the Islamic State in 2013, al-Qaeda’s 7-step program for global domination seems to be proceeding right on schedule.


Today, in the year 2015, we are five years from the end of the project, and the world is in the midst of Step #5 of al-Qaeda’s manifesto. Even al-Qaeda could not have predicted such a high level of success and the ease with which it has been accomplished. Why? Because of reckless, weak leadership in the White House combined with a cynical media that refuses to believe such things could happen. Stir in undeniable ignorance about Islam throughout the West and terrorism has a recipe for achieving its goals with hardly a whimper.

10 News  This 20 year, 7 step plan by Al-Qaeda was first disclosed in 1996 by Al-Qaeda leaders to the Jordanian journalist Fouad Hussein. Hussein met Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi while they were both in a Jordanian jail (Fouad was a political prisoner). Al-Maqdisi was the mentor of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a high-ranking Al-Qaeda leader (killed in 2006).

The below excerpt is from a Spiegel article from 2005. Judging from the present situation in West Europe, “total confrontation” is in no way unlikely to happen in 2016, just as Al-Qaeda has planned it:


The First Phase (2000-2003): Known as “The Awakening” — this has already been carried out and was supposed to have lasted from 2000 to 2003, or more precisely from the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 in New York and Washington to the fall of Baghdad in 2003. The aim of the attacks of 9/11 was to provoke the US into declaring war on the Islamic world and thereby “awakening” Muslims. “The first phase was judged by the strategists and masterminds behind al-Qaida as very successful,” writes Hussein. “The battle field was opened up and the Americans and their allies became a closer and easier target.” The terrorist network is also reported as being satisfied that its message can now be heard “everywhere.”


The Second Phase (2003-2006): Known as “Opening Eyes,” this is, according to Hussein’s definition, the period we are now in and should last until 2006. Hussein says the terrorists hope to make the western conspiracy aware of the “Islamic community.” Hussein believes this is a phase in which al-Qaeda wants an organization to develop into a movement. The network is banking on recruiting young men during this period. Iraq should become the center for all global operations, with an “army” set up there and bases established in other Arabic states.


The Third Phase (2007-2010): This is described as “Arising and Standing Up” and should last from 2007 to 2010. “There will be a focus on Syria,” prophesies Hussein, based on what his sources told him. The fighting cadres are supposedly already prepared and some are in Iraq. Attacks on Turkey and — even more explosive — in Israel are predicted. Al-Qaeda’s masterminds hope that attacks on Israel will help the terrorist group become a recognized organization. The author also believes that countries neighboring Iraq, such as Jordan, are also in danger.


The Fourth Phase (2010-2013): Between 2010 and 2013, Hussein writes that al-Qaeda will “Toppling Arab Governments” aim to bring about the collapse of the hated Arabic governments in Egypt, Libya, Iraq, Tunisia and Syria. The estimate is that “the creeping loss of the regimes’ power will lead to a steady growth in strength within al-Qaeda.” At the same time attacks will be carried out against oil suppliers and the US economy will be targeted using cyber terrorism. The U.S. position is making every effort to terminate Assad’s regime. Meanwhile, two other phases of the manifesto remain. The West can continue to battle the enemy with empty rhetoric and failing to recognize the threat or it can actually do something about it.


The Fifth Phase (2013-2016): This will be the point at which an “Islamic State,” or caliphate, can be declared. The plan is that by this time, between 2013 and 2016, Western influence in the Islamic world will be so reduced and Israel weakened so much, that resistance will not be feared. Al-Qaeda hopes that by then the Islamic state will be able to bring about a new world order.


The Sixth Phase (2016-2020): Hussein believes that from 2016 onwards there will a period of “Total Confrontation.” As soon as the caliphate has been declared the “Islamic army” it will instigate the “fight between the believers and the non-believers” which has so often been predicted by Osama bin Laden.


The Seventh Phase (2020-) This final stage is described as “Definitive Victory.” Hussein writes that in the terrorists’ eyes, because the rest of the world will be so beaten down by the “one-and-a-half billion Muslims,” the caliphate will undoubtedly succeed. This phase should be completed by 2020, although the war shouldn’t last longer than two years.



Justified outrage over Cecil the lion, yet not a word from the whimpering leftists about the daily ‘Elephant Jihad’ by Muslim poachers in Africa?

Remember the 2013 massacre of Christians by al-Shabaab Muslim terrorists at the mall in Nairobi, Kenya? That was financed, in large part, by the poaching of elephants for their ivory.


Frontpage Magazine (h/t Susan K)  How is the carnage at an upscale shopping mall in Nairobi linked to a surge in the poaching of wild elephants in Africa?

Elephants are being slaughtered in record numbers in Africa. As reported in The Washington Post last summer, more than 30,000 elephants were killed by poachers last year, the largest number in decades. Over the last five years there has been a huge spike in poaching that threatens the extinction of one of the planet’s most intelligent and iconic species.


Islamic terror group Al-Shabaab finances as much as 40% of its operations this way. The supply of ivory for al-Shabaab and other militant groups is, obviously, dead elephants. As demand for ivory continues to surge in China and other Asian countries, the slaughter is growing industrial in scale and efficiency, fueling a trade worth $7 billion to $10 billion a year.


A 2011 report by the Elephant Action League, whose mission is to fight elephant exploitation and wildlife crime, dubs elephant ivory “the white gold of jihad.”


Sudanese Muslim militiamen and Somali al-Shabaab terrorists are financing their jihad from poaching raids against the endangered wildlife in mostly Christian neighboring countries.

Africa Review (h/t Susan K) The janjaweed poachers use the profits from massacring the African elephant to continue their massacres against black African Christians in Darfur.  The common link is their utter disregard for life and for the rule of law.


Cameroon’s Special Forces have been deployed to foil an imminent raid by Sudanese poachers who for eight weeks earlier this year slaughtered half the population of elephants for their ivory at one of the country’s wildlife reserves.


The poachers have been attempting to take park guards in northern Cameroon by surprise by exploiting greater ground cover that has sprouted in the rainy season, according to international conservation body World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), which said it had been informed by high ranking officials of the Rapid Intervention Battalion (BIR) on Friday.


“This is the same group of poachers that in early 2012 travelled more than 1,000km on horseback from northern Sudan across the Central African Republic and Chad to kill over 300 elephants in the Bouba N’Djida National Park in northern Cameroon,” WWF said.


The heavily armed and well coordinated poachers, who had told local villagers of their plans to kill as many elephants as possible, claimed they had killed as much as 650 out of some 1,000 that roamed the park.


The elephant population in Cameroon and in central Africa is estimated to have been halved, mainly by poachers, between 1995 and 2007 with the number of elephants killed still on the rise…


A story from the New York Times in September explained that Sudan’s janjaweed, the Arab Muslim supremacists who bear responsibility for the genocide against black Africans in Darfur, are offenders in the illegal ivory trade. 


 Der Spiegel reports that janjaweed poachers use the proceeds for arms:  “The millions of dollars their poaching raid must have brought in will allow them to replenish their weapons stores.” The New York Times also identified al-Shabaab from Somalia as an ivory poaching participant.


al-Shabaab, the militant Islamist group that has pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda, recently began training fighters to infiltrate neighboring Kenya and kill elephants for ivory to raise money.


One former al-Shabaab associate said that the Shabaab were promising to “facilitate the marketing” of ivory and have encouraged villagers along the Kenya-Somalia border to bring them tusks, which are then shipped out through the port of Kismayo, a notorious smuggling hub and the last major town the Shaabab still control.

Dead Elephant, Why?

Sadly, the Islamic tradition of raiding, pillaging, plundering and exploitation of natural resources and property is alive and well in Africa.


Is ‘Islamophobia’ maligning the reputation of the Paedophile Prophet Muhammad as never before?

Well, we certainly hope so!


HUFFINGTON POST  In the West’s cultural delirium, the military, economic and political mindsets involving the invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan and covert and not-so-covert intrusions into Pakistan, the most prominent target is the life, personality and character of the Prophet Muhammad.

 Beyond the legacy of colonialism, the often frosty relations between Islam and the West have come to be defined largely by post-Sept. 11 ideas and events. Several narratives such as “the clash of civilizations,” the “war of ideas,” the “war on terror,” the Crusades against Islamofascism have thus been used in vogue in reference to this relationship.


The “Islamophobic” literature of the current decade, for which the Internet is a fertile breeding ground, has the omnipresence of former “Muslims” (e.g. Ayaan Hirsi Ali , Wafa Sultan and Walid Shoebat) and others (such as Ibn Warraq or Ali Sina) who have attempted to present neo-Orientalism in a theological garb — as opposed to Orientalism as a way of depicting people of the East in a condescending manner (“the other,” “the savages”).


Moreover, the instantaneity with which the text, graphics and audiovisual bits are transmitted today has added new dimensions to this intensified diatribe. Portrayal of the Islamic prophetic life these days is a pointed vilification manifested in its focus on pedophilia, slaverypolygamy and holy” war. In the past, the dominating Orientalist approach used philology, history and comparative religion to describe the life of the Prophet Muhammad.


The hate, rage, calumny and prejudices against Islam in the West do not distinguish between the Quran, the prophet and Muslims at large. Both neo-Orientalism and Islamophobia, though recognizing the archetypal status of the prophet, target one and all in their relentless assaults upon Islamic dignity and integrity. It may be argued that such an ideological blitzkrieg often culminates in the invasion and occupation of Muslim lands.


In 2011 in Gainesville, Florida, an American evangelical pastor supervised the burning of a copy of the Quran in a church after finding it “guilty” of crimes. It is not an isolated incident.



There is a pattern to it. The story of the desecration of the Quran at Guantanamo Bay prison was well documented: it was reportedly flushed down the toilet to rattle Muslim detainees (The story was later retracted by Newsweek, but similar incidents have occurred). The same year, American jailers splashed a copy of the Quran with urinekicked and stepped on it and soaked it with water. American soldiers urinated on a dead Taliban terrorist.


German businessman printed the name of the Quran on toilet paper and offered the rolls for sale.


Incidents such as the use of Quranic verses as a tattoo on the lower dorsal side of female body, their imprinting on leather used for women’s shoes and garments printed with these verses worn by half-naked female models in fashion shows are not entirely uncommon.


The Dutch MP Geert Wilders issued on the Internet a poor collage entitled Fitna, and compared the Quran with Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf.”


And joining the Islam-bashing bandwagon was none other than Pope Benedict XVI with an affront to the prophet and highly derogatory remarks about Islam. 

Pakistan Pope Blasphemy Law

These incidents are only a tiny fraction of the events and materials that continue to target Islam, its prophet and Muslims in the most denigrate and despicable manner. The language and the graphics employed to create this avalanche of bigotry is, to say the least, unthinkable by any civilized person in any time and age.


The verbal and visual onslaught, especially experienced by Muslims who frequent the Internet, hardly ever gets reported in mass media. The magnitude of this hate can be gauged by entering a simple keyword on Google. Early this week, use of a single search term — Islamophobia — yielded some 2,000,000 resultsover 2,000 for books on the subject and nearly 1,000,000 images out of the keywords “Islamophobia images.” 


I am awestruck to witness what is depicted in the name of the Holy Grail of freedom of expression. Invoking the maximum reach of modern technology to broadcast hate, no other faith has been maligned like Islam.


No prophet has been subjected to such atrocities as the prophet of Islam. No other group of believers has been made to suffer such deep and lasting emotional scars inflicted by this “freedom.” However, rising Muslim anti-Semitism, something that has been largely non-existent in the long peaceful history of Jewish-Muslim relations  (HAH!)  is a cause of serious concern because it opens up a ‘new’ gate of hate


We would be amiss to believe that these statements were made in a “politically correct” context and had transitory value. Nay, they have come to define the way the West looks at Islam, its prophet and Muslims. We do not need to dig any deeper to understand the influence of these opinions in academia as well as the public square. Not to mention reformulation of old state policies or introduction of new controls.



Over the last decade we have witnessed a slow death of multiculturalism, an end to liberal thinking, increasing curbs upon personal freedomenhanced surveillance of Muslim individuals, a lowered threshold of toleranceharassmentunlawful Muslim detention and ultimately a ban on Shariah.


In public life, travel restrictionsdiscriminationviolenceprofilingban on the burqa, denial of permission to raise minarets or to build mosques and restrictions on halal manufacturing are but some of the (totally rational) prejudices faced by Muslims


The Oriental romanticism, mystique and the mystery of Arabia deserta with the feuding Bedouins and the opulent harem now is replaced with a new plethora of stereotypes for the Arabian prophet” and his worldwide followers. They now are cast in new dyes. 


Extrapolating the atrocities committed by the so-called Caliphate installed by a bunch of ISIS MUSLIM terrorists, over 1.3 billion Muslims worldwide now face the daily burden of collective guilt for the reports of the alleged crucifixion of spieschild rapeslaughtering of non-Muslims, mass execution of childrenburning alive of enemies, savage beheadings, looting and burning of libraries, killing caged enemies by drowning, sexual slavery, stifling human rights of minoritiestraining of children as executioners and suicide bombers and massive destruction of antiquities, including the tomb of Prophet Jonah, among many other sordid tales of death and destruction. Islamophobes are never tired of chanting the mantra: ISIS is Islam; Islam is ISIS. 



The classical Orientalism neither had the means nor the evil imagination to portray the prophet in a manner akin to what we are observing today. The paradigmatic shift is, to a large extent, technology-mediated and no longer makes pristine intellectual pursuits a trait of this academic discipline. Truth stands sacrificed at the altar of political expediency to the extent that benign scholarship is made to appear as suspect. In the name of “revenge” for the Sept. 11 attack, an intellectual and political noose is being tightened and attempting to distort the personality and the message of Muhammad.



MUSLIM ANIMAL ABUSE: Torturing helpless animals for fun and entertainment…not just food

Some of the videos at the below links may have been taken down by  websites, such as Youtube, that often cave to Muslim pressure. None of the links are about barbaric, brutal halal slaughter (other than the photos below). Just normal everyday Muslim animal abuse.


Pakistan Eid al Adha   ISL102















































AGAIN! Islamic State (ISIS) throws two gay men to their deaths from a roof in Syria as a large crowd including children come out to watch

The footage, reportedly shot in Palmyra, Syria, shows the savage execution of two Syrian men accused of being homosexuals.

ISIS fighters read their charges to the crowd.

ISIS fighters read their charges to the crowd.

UK Mirror  Yet another video of ISIS killers throwing men from the roof of a tall building after accusing them of being gay has emerged online.

The footage, reportedly shot in Palmyra, Syria, shows the savage execution of two Syrian men accused of being homosexuals.

The men are blindfolded and then thrown off the roof

The men are blindfolded and then thrown off the roof with their hands tied

They were thrown off a roof and then stoned to death by the thugs of the caliphate. Children were present in the crowd.


Middle East Journalist Zaid Benjamin said on Twitter that the two Syrian men were executed for “having a homosexual affair.” IBT reports that Isis has been using its fighters in honey traps to expose gay men and then kill them.

These "events" always draw a crowd

These “events” always draw a crowd

The Britain-based Observatory documented that 3,027 civilians, rebels, members of the regime forces and allied militiamen and ISIS members were executed by IS since the declaration of its alleged “caliphate”.

The terror group executed 1,787 civilians, including 74 children and 86 women, by shooting, beheading, stoning, throwing from high places and burning.

Notice all the stones around the men, The crowd stones them on the ground just in case the fall didn't kill them

Notice all the stones around the men, The crowd stones them on the ground just in case the fall didn’t kill them

































“When we behead people, we are obeying the Sharia (Islamic) law,” says Italian Catholic woman who converted to Islam and joined ISIS

isis-married1It is news that has stunned Italy. In just a few short years, Fatima Az Zahra, née Maria Giulia Sergio, an educated and articulate young Catholic woman, has converted to Islam, became radicalized and went to join the Islamic Sate (ISIS) in Syria before persuading her extended family to join her.

Fatima Az Zahra, née Maria Giulia Sergio

Fatima Az Zahra, née Maria Giulia Sergio

Independent  After marrying a local Muslim pizza-maker of Moroccan origin, the Naples-born 27-year-old, dubbed “Lady Jihad” by the Italian press, rejected her husband’s moderate brand of Islam and left him for an Albanian, Aldo Kobuzi, who “interpreted the faith in the correct way”, as she told a friend, before traveling to Syria with Mr Kobuzi and his mother in September last year.

Her views changed radically as she embraced the toxic ideology of Islam. “Here we are killing the non-believers in order to expand the Islamic State. We don’t want to be friends with the non-believers, we don’t want to have anything to do with them,” she said on Skype to her family.


“These are not just idle words, these are obligations… You should see what the Mujahideen do for love of Allah… 15- and 16-year-olds killing 50 non-believers… That’s what we have to do to expand the Islamic State.”

But it is the news that her formerly staunchly Catholic mother, father and sister subsequently converted and were preparing to join her in Syria, before police arrested them on Wednesday this week, that has stunned Italy. In Skype conversations with her family in March, Ms Sergio was heard imploring them to join her and Isis: “It is the perfect state, like paradise”, she said, adding there was “food in abundance”, “healthcare” and “rigid rules even in dress codes”.

Her extended family

Her extended family

Her sister Marianna, 31, appeared to be the keenest to head to the Middle East. Her mother, Assunta Buonfiglio, 60, was eventually persuaded when it was promised that Isis would supply her with a washing machine, La Repubblica reported. Her father, Sergio Sergio, 61, had recently quit his job as the family made plans to flee Italy.

Of Ms Sergio’s family, it appears that only her grandmother had sufficient faculties to resist the offer of life with medieval killers in wartorn Syria. She was described by her jihadist granddaughter as “a non-believer who deserves to be left behind”.



TUNISIAN TOURISM DEPARTMENT Asks: “Would you stop visiting New York, London, Paris…?”

A provocative advertising campaign featuring images of terror attacks in Western capitals urges tourists not to abandon Tunisia in the wake of two Muslim terrorist attacks directed specifically at foreign tourists.


Independent  The campaign, launched by a Tunisian communications firm, asks “would you stop visiting” alongside images of London during the 7/7 bombings, New York during the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Centre and a placard signifying the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris. A caption reads “Support Tunisia, land of ‘peace.'”

The question should be, why would you visit a Muslim country in the first place? If you do that in this day and age, you deserve what you get.


Tunisia suffered its own terror attack just over a week ago when an Islamist gunman opened fire on tourists at a beach resort in Sousse, killing 39 people. This followed a March attack which killed 19 in a museum in Tunisia frequented by foreign tourists.

642x999_7845866Selim Ben Hadj Yahia posted the campaign images on Facebook saying he created them in the wake of “the shock and sadness” of the Sousse attack, and that he hoped they spoke to “Tunisia’s friends around the world.”

The campaign has been praised by some, but criticised by others who said the attack in Sousse was different as it targeted tourists.

JUNE 2015: 39 Tourists dead in MUSLIM terrorist attack on Tunisia beach resort

MARCH 2015: 19 Tourists dead in MUSLIM terrorist attack on Tunisia Museum

In 2014 nearly 425,000 British tourists travelled to Tunisia. Thirty of the 38 people killed in the Sousse attack were British holiday makers…thereby making British tourists the most suicidal tourists on earth.