Hey, Obama! Hey, Clinton! Are these the Syrian widows and 3-year-old orphans you keep whining about?

Bet you could put up a few dozen in the White House, Barry. And Hillary, surely you have room for several of these ‘widows and children?’ Even better, how about asking Chelsea to give refuge to one of the ‘refujihadis’ in her $10 million condo in NYC? Surely, little Charlotte could use a big brother.


AMAZING SPEECH by Marine Le Pen to the EU Parliament on Islamic terrorism

“If you are unable to name the enemy, you cannot fight the enemy. The assassin is not terrorism. Terrorism is the weapon. The murderer is the ideology of Islamic fundamentalism (in other words Islam).”

{…}”So, in essence, if we call countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and even Turkey our allies, then we, too, are the allies of Islamic fundamentalism. {… }There is no way to screen who is coming into Europe because the Islamic State is issuing valid passports. {…} We have no borders and even if we did, we have no military to defend them. That must change or Europe will never be secure.”


MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING: An internal investigation has been launched into a profanity-laden anti-Muslim Facebook rant that a sheriff allegedly posted last week.

NEW JERSEY sheriff rants against Muslims in profanity-filled Facebook post, but says he would protect ‘the good ones’ (if only he could find any).

Alex Pino, defender of First Amenment rights is deprived of his First Amendment rights

Alex Pino, defender of First Amenment rights is deprived of his First Amendment rights

NJ.com  Alex Pino of the Hudson County Sheriff’s Office is in hot water after posting his rant on Facebook in response to a friend’s comment.He later deleted the comment but someone took a screen shot of it.



In an interview with NJ Advance Media, Pino said he is a disabled veteran of the Iraq war who was deployed three times. 

He said he is remorseful about his comment, which he posted “in the heat of the moment” and in “defense mode” in response to one of his Facebook friend’s comments. However, he said that it was being blown out of proportion. Rather than threatening others, he said, he was “defending myself and the people in the line of duty and my fellow veterans who gave their lives.”


“We’re entitled to our opinions, and I had mine. I’m tired of being bashed all the time,” he said. “I’m in fear for my life… I have to protect my family, my children. I can’t take them to a movie theatre because I’m afraid about what’s going to happen.”

He said that “of course I would protect (Muslims), you know, the good ones, not the extremists.” (How do you tell the difference?)  Pino also said he wasn’t making his comment as a police officer but making a “general statement” as a private citizen. “I do my job and I do it great,” he said. “I did serve my country, and I served it well.”

Pino, who defended his right to free speech, joins a growing list of public figures who have come under fire for their Facebook commentary about Muslims.



Shhhhh…don’t tell the media, but there are a lot of people in the Black community supporting Donald Trump

These are the hard-working producers, not the takers, in the Black community for whom Donald Trump’s message has been resonating, something the left wing media would rather you didn’t know. 


Daily Caller  Dr. Darrell Scott, Pastor of New Spirit Revival Center in Cleveland Heights, Ohio, said the Monday meeting between black pastors and Donald Trump was a “meaningful dialogue… and we voiced concerns that were sensitive to the African-American community.”

Scott, speaking at Trump Tower in New York City said, “I didn’t have concerns [with Trump] because I was already convinced, but there were concerns that the liberal media has put out portraying Mr. Trump in a light that I know he’s not the type of person he was depicted to be. So what we were able to do today was allow to see his heart for themselves and to make up their own minds about him. And they find out that he’s not the person that the media has depicted him to be.”



Republican candidates will continue to attack Muslims because Americans increasingly agree with them

CU1KokcWcAELex0_jpglarge-viFully 84% of Republicans oppose taking in tens of thousands of unscreened Syrian Muslim ‘refugees,’ compared with just 40% of Democrats. The leading GOP presidential candidates view Muslims as fair game for increasingly harsh words and so far, that strategy is winning support from conservatives influential in picking the nominee, not to mention independents and some democrats of every race.

UK Daily Mail  Many Republicans are heartened by strong rhetoric addressing what they view as a threat to national security by Islam itself, analysts say.  Because Muslims are a small (mainly Democrat) voting bloc, the candidates see limited fallout from what they are saying in the campaign.

‘I think this issue exists on its own island,’ said Steve Schmidt, a Republican political consultant who ran Sen. John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign. ‘It’s highly unlikely to cause a political penalty, and there is no evidence that it has.’

Since the attacks that killed 130 people in Paris, GOP front-runner Donald Trump has said he might want to register certain Muslims in the U.S. and surveil radical American mosques. 

‘Donald Trump is already very well-known for being brash and outspoken and is appealing to a group of people – an increasingly large segment American voters, of every race, who seem to like that kind of tough talk,’ said John Green, director of the Bliss Institute of Applied Politics at the University of Akron.


Rival Ben Carson said allowing Syrian refugees into the U.S. would be akin to exposing a neighborhood to a ‘rabid dog.’ And he would favor barring Muslims from holding office if they refuse to denounce sharia law.


 Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee said, ‘I’d like for Barack Obama to resign if he’s not going to protect America and instead protect the image of Islam.’

The sentiment also plays well for evangelicals concerned about violence directed at Christians in the Middle East and angered about restrictions their missionaries face in predominantly Muslim countries.

Such statements appeal to Republicans who think Obama and Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton, the former secretary of state, have not done enough to fight jihadis, Green said.

(In fact, Clinton goes out of her way not to tie Islam to all the violent and hateful teachings against non-Muslims that dominate the quran and other Islamic holy books, not to mention the sermons of radical imams in many mosques in America and around the world)


PENNSYLVANIA: Is the shooting of Muslim taxi driver an indication that Muslims should consider moving out of America…permanently?

Designated Terrorist Group CAIR is calling on the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate the Thanksgiving Day shooting of a Muslim taxi driver in Pittsburgh, Penn., as a hate crime similar to a growing number of attacks targeting the nation’s Muslim community following the recent Muslim terror attacks in Paris.


Anti-Muslim backlash threatens to cause lasting damage…heh!

151117143352-exp-muslim-community-fears-islamophobic-backlash-00002607-exlarge-169Nour Obeidallah didn’t know how to react when someone called her “Osama bin Laden.” The insult made little sense, said under the breath of a person who felt they’d been slighted while waiting in line for the bus. But it still stung.

MSNBC  That same weekend, customers at a bagel shop did little to veil their suspicious looks toward Obeidallah’s family, she said. In voices just loud enough for her sister to hear, they wondered whether her head scarf meant that she was a terrorist. “We don’t know what’s in her purse,” one whispered loudly to the other.

No, the anti-Muslim rhetoric is heating up more than ever before. And rightly so.

No way, the anti-Muslim rhetoric is heating up more than ever before. And rightly so.

Who knows, maybe they thought her sister was carrying around a bomb while ordering breakfast, Obeidallah later recalled, only half-jokingly. The 24-year-old frequently escapes this small New Jersey city where she was born and raised for New York City, a short trip away on public transit. But things are different these days.


Those small episodes—the side glances, sneering comments and veiled threats — have grown more common, Obeidallah said, ever since the Paris terror attacks unleashed a fierce current of anti-Islam sentiment across the U.S. Many Muslim Americans have reported instances of discrimination, even attempted violence. Others have opted to stay home. Even for an Arab-American community here that is already conditioned to these racially charged slights, the hysteria is having a profound impact.


GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump has played a key role in fanning the flames. This week it got personal for Obeidallah after the celebrity real estate mogul claimed that Paterson, the place where she was born and raised, was the site where “thousands and thousands” of Arabs and Muslims were seen cheering after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

“It’s not true. And it’s just insulting,” she said. (Maybe not thousands but hundreds for sure)

For years, residents of this small New Jersey city with a large Arab-American community 20 miles outside of Manhattan have tried to fight off unfounded rumors about their response to 9/11—a task that has faced them with the near-impossibility of proving a negative.


That two of the 9/11 hijackers had temporarily stayed in Paterson before the attacks didn’t help. Many residents had friends and loved ones killed in the attacks. Like all Americans—and maybe even a little more than most—they were grieving.

“We were devastated. We were surprised. And also, almost ashamed. The fact that it was Arabs who committed these attacks really depressed the community,” said John Abdelhadi, a Paterson lawyer. (Not just Arabs, Arab MUSLIMS)

Now, the city’s residents fear that even though Trump’s claims rest largely on rumors and unverified reports, they’ll cause lasting harm. (That’s why we love Trump)

“Something that’s really damaging is that people are going to start being too afraid to come to the mosque,” Obeidallah said.

Ibrahim Hooper, communications director at the designated terrorist group Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), said many people across the country have come forward in recent weeks, particularly Arab and Muslim women, saying they’re too afraid of the public backlash to leave their homes. (Good, stay home. Even better, go back to the Islamic hellhole you came from)


“I don’t think we’ve seen this kind of siege mentality since 9/11,” Hooper said. “People are really frightened for their families.” (It’s about time! Now you know how WE feel being around muslims)


“He’s going to get somebody hurt,” Rep. Keith Ellison, a Hamas terrorist supporter and Minnesota Democrat and one of two Muslim members serving in Congress (who was sworn in using an anti-democracy quran), said of Trump in an interview with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Monday. “Invariably, the people who are mentally unstable or are motivated by hate come out of the woodwork, and you see desecrations of buildings that are associated with those groups, you see assaults, you see murders.”


Indeed, things already appear to have gone beyond fiery rhetoric.

* In the last week and a half, a Virginia man was charged with leaving a fake bomb at a mosque.

* Two Muslim women claimed without proof that they were spit on in Brooklyn.

Two Philadelphia men were initially told not to board their flight home from Chicago after a fellow passenger, who had overheard them speaking Arabic, told the airport gate agent that he did not feel safe flying with them—one of several incidents involving Muslims who were held up in various airports.

* In Connecticut, bullet holes now line the walls of a mosque. A pregnant Muslim woman told San Diego police that she was assaulted and verbally harassed with racially charged threats (Of course there were no witnesses)


SHOP AT ZARA! Paris store under fire for denying entry to a Muslim supremacist wearing a headbag


Global fashion chain Zara has faced a huge backlash after a video emerged of a woman wearing a hijab being denied entrance to a store in Paris.

UK Mirror  In the footage in the wake of the ISIS terrorist attacks in France , a woman is stopped by a security guard.  He tells her anyone who has their head covered with a hat, cap or hood may not enter the store.

She asks if she can enter the store with a headscarf on and he refuses. “If things change, they’ll change, but I don’t make the rules,” he tells her. The video led to outcry on social media along with calls for a boycott on Zara’s Facebook page.

By BareNakedIslam Posted in Women

RUSSIA bans George Soros and his organizations for being a threat to its national security

This is the same George Soros who funded Obama’s two presidential campaigns and now  is funding Hillary Clinton’s largest super pac.

CSWbaZYWsAETIia Soros Backs Hillary Clinton

RT  The Russian Prosecutor General’s Office has recognized George Soros’s Open Society Institute and another affiliated organization as undesirable groups, banning Russian citizens and organizations from participation in any of their projects. 

Russia’s deputy FM has told senators that the recently introduced law allowing automatic bans on groups that pose a threat to national security was a necessary step, adding that many such NGOs were in reality funded by foreign governments.


In a statement released on Monday, prosecutors said the activities of the Open Society Institute and the Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation were a threat to the foundations of Russia’s Constitutional order and national security. They added that the Justice Ministry would be duly informed about these conclusions and would add the two groups to Russia’s list of undesirable foreign organizations.

Prosecutors launched a probe into the activities of the two organizations – both sponsored by the well-known US financier George Soros – in July this year, after Russian senators approved the so-called “patriotic stop-list” of 12 groups that required immediate attention over their supposed anti-Russian activities. Other groups on the list included the National Endowment for Democracy; the International Republican Institute; the National Democratic Institute; the MacArthur Foundation and Freedom House.


In late July, the Russian Justice Ministry recognized the US National Endowment for Democracy as an undesirable group after prosecutors discovered the US NGO had spent millions on attempts to question the legitimacy of Russian elections and tarnish the prestige of national military service.

The Law on Undesirable Foreign Organizations came into force in early June this year. It requires the Prosecutor General’s Office and the Foreign Ministry to draw up an official list of undesirable foreign organizations and outlaw their activities. Once a group is recognized as undesirable, its assets in Russia must be frozen, its offices closed and the distribution of any of its materials must be banned.

If the ban is violated, the personnel of the outlawed group and any Russian citizens who cooperate with them could face heavy fines, or even prison terms in the case of repeated or aggravated offends.

Soros has demanded that Europe take in at least 1 million Muslims per year

Soros has demanded that Europe take in at least 1 million Muslims per year


UNHOLY ALLIANCE: Christian charities rake in $1 billion in profits from federal program to resettle MOSTLY UNSCREENED MUSLIMS

refugeehorde-viThough they are officially “non-profit” organizations, Catholic Charities, Lutheran Social Services, and several other Christian organizations, as well as a Jewish one are profiting from lucrative contracts with the federal government to resettle increasingly Muslim refugees in the US.

Breitbart  Of the 100,000 refugees resettled in the United States in 2014 under the Refugee Resettlement program, an estimated 40 percent were Muslims.


In FY 2015, the State Department, through the Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration and the Office of Refugee Resettlement, spent more than $1 billion on these programs, which settled international refugees “vetted” by the United Nations High Commission on International Refugees in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. T

he federal government spent hundreds of millions of dollars more than that on refugees, however. The Department of Health and Human Services also provided a number of “entitlements” to these refugees.


Much of this $1 billion in annual revenue goes to voluntary agencies (VOLAGs), several of which are Christian non-profits, such as Catholic Charities, Lutheran Social ServicesWorld Relief CorporationChurch World Service, and Domestic and Foreign Missionary Service of the Episcopal Church of the USA. (also referred to as Episcopal Migration Ministries), who are contracted on behalf of the government to help these refugees get settled in their new homes in America.

Five of the top nine VOLAGs are Christian non-profits. The other four are Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, International Rescue Committee, US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, and the Ethiopian Community Development Council.


After providing three to four months of resettlement services to these refugees, having been well compensated for their assistance services, these Christian non-profit VOLAGS stop providing services and are not required to keep track of their location within the United States.

As Ann Corcoran wrote recently at Refugee Resettlement Watch, the arrangement benefits the VOLAGs but provides little comfort to Americans worried about the national security implications of bringing in so many unvetted refugees:


Refugee resettlement is profitable to the organizations involved in it. They receive money from the federal government for each refugee they bring over. They have almost no real responsibilities for these refugees. After 4 months the “sponsoring” organization is not even required to know where the refugee lives.

A good percentage of the revenues of these Christian “non-profit” organizations, many of which were originally established to provide charitable services to the poor already within local American communities, now comes from their work as subcontractors to the federal government to relocate these foreign, often Muslim, refugees.


In effect, critics argue, these VOLAGS have become agents of the federal government whose new mission is to import terrorism to the United States under the false flag of Christian compassion.

As Refugee Resettlement Watch reported, there are multiple ways for these VOLAGs to generate revenue from this program:

a. $1,850 per refugee (including children) from the State Department.

b. Up to $2,200 for each refugee by participating in a U.S. DHHS program known as Matching Grant. To get the $2,200, the Volag need only show it spent $200 and gave away $800 worth of donated clothes, furniture, or cars.

c. The Volag pockets 25 percent of every transportation loan it collects from refugees it “sponsors”.

d. All Volag expenses and overhead in the Washington, DC HQ are paid by the U.S. government.

e. For their refugee programs, Volags collect money from all federal grant programs – “Marriage Initiative,” “Faith-based,” “Ownership Society etc., as well as from various state and local grants.


The program is so lucrative that in some towns the Catholic Church has lessened support for traditional charity works to put more effort into resettlement. It uses collection offerings to promote the refugee resettlement program.

Despite claims that these Muslim refugees have been “vetted” to keep out terrorists, numerous reports, including those by the Department of Homeland Security and FBI, indicate that this process is flawed, especially for refugees from countries like Syria, where virtually no data bases to perform background checks exist.


Of the approximately 2,000 Syrian refugees who have come to the United States over the past several years, an estimated 97 percent are Muslim.

Obama wants to bring in an additional 10,000 Syrian refugees to the United States in FY 2016 (which ends September 30, 2016). Some reports, which GOP Presidential frontrunner Donald Trump has been referencing frequently, indicate that the President wants to bring in as many as 250,000 Syrian refugees in the United States in the very near future.


Until 1990, very few Muslims were brought in. Since then, about 40 percent of refugees have been Muslim. In those 25 years, more than one million Muslims have been brought to the United States through this program.

Over the past five years, 680,000 green cards have been issued to Muslim immigrants (not all of whom came to the U.S. under the Refugee Resettlement program).


SWEDEN: 14,000 MUSLIM illegal aliens set for deportation have mysteriously disappeared

1233673991Well over half of all the illegal alien Muslim migrants slated for deportation in Sweden have slipped past the Swedish police — with illegal numbers at the highest ever levels.

Breitbart  The numbers come from the National Border Police Section in the National Operations Division, and show of 22,000 individuals due to be sent home after having their asylum applications turned down, some 14,000 have vanished off the police radar, reports Afton Bladet.


Some are expected to have left the country secretly, but the majority are thought to still be in Sweden, having fallen through the cracks of the comprehensive welfare state. “We simply do not know where they are”, said a police spokesman. Even in cases where the police manage to find illegals and send them home, nations such as Afghanistan, Iran, Somalia, Eritrea, Lebanon, Morocco and Libya don’t accept their own people back in many cases.

A number of unscrupulous employers in the country have taken advantage of the invisible migrants, using them as cheap labour off the books, with no wages tax to pay or minimum wage to heed.


At the start of 2015 the migration bureau was responsible for deporting migrants who failed to gain a visa, but with the rising tide of migration creating new challenges for Sweden the job was transferred to the Police in October.

The task of deportations was handed over to police because the migration board considered that as the situation deteriorated, “coercion would be necessary” to get migrants to leave. Yet through a severe lack of manpower, resources, and political mandate to take proper action the police have proven unequal to the job.


A police spokesman said they simply did not have enough officers, having been ordered this month to become border police as well, enacting government policy to check passports and papers.

Again hamstrung by government policy, the border checks have also been a failure, making no significant reduction in the number of migrants crossing into the country daily. Officers were only permitted to make spot checks at the border, and were forbidden to profile individuals on the basis of their  ethnicity, language spoken, or skin colour, making effective control impossible.

Pat Condell on the rape of Sweden: