Oct 20 2016
Oct 20 2016
As he prepares to step down, citing his advancing years, Joachim Gauck hinted that he wanted a Muslim to succeed him. Further pushing his arrogance to the limit, he condemned the newly-growing sense of German national identity and the danger of a disintegration of the EU, saying: “The elites are not the problem at all, the population is at the moment the problem.”
UK Express The 76-year-old’s remarks are likely to create difficulties for the already embattled chancellor, Mrs Merkel, who is already facing an increasingly fractious debate over the Islamization of Germany, sparked by her open door refugee policy. Echoing his concerns, an MP for Mrs Merkel’s coalition government said people “will put up the wall by force” to this decision.
Christian Democratic (CDU) MP, Klaus-Peter Willsch added: “That is not good for our country.” Mr Gauck’s successor will not be decided by a direct vote, but by the political parties, along with a congress including sports people, celebrities and other public figures.
Vice-President of the EU Parliament, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, said it would not be acceptable for the next German president to be ”a mullah with a Turban” but it is plausible for a “representative of modern, enlightened Islam” (but there is no such thing) to be the next leader.
But Germany has witnessed a dramatic changing attitude of the nation’s population towards the religion over the past year, which has seen the arrival of more than one million MUSLIM migrants. CDU MP Karl- Georg Wellmann described the plans as “totally absurd”
He said: “That would not be appropriate in the current situation. This would only deepen the divisions in society. ”
Oct 20 2016
This was filmed 11 days before the devastating Islamic State terrorist attacks in Brussels on March 22, 2016.
Mischaël Modrikamen is a Belgian lawyer and politician. He is the co-founder and leader of the People’s Party. He is the vice-président of the Alliance For Direct Democracy in Europe.
Citizens of Brussels are speaking out against Hillary Clinton, who say “she’s the same type of corrupt politician we have here in Europe, a globalist.”
Oct 19 2016
No, but it should be.
— CAIR National (@CAIRNational) October 19, 2016
Myrtle Beach Online When talking about immigration, invariably the topic of Muslim immigration presents itself. There are U.S. citizens who believe that though Muslims have murdered many U.S. citizens in this country, Muslims committing the murders are not representative of Muslims as a whole.
“Don’t punish all Muslims for the sins of a few,” so to speak. Experts estimate that between 15 percent to 25 percent of Muslims are terrorists, the ones who stab, behead, murder and massacre non-Muslims to make Islam the only system of governance in a country.
During World War II, most Germans were peaceful. However, the extremely violent Nazis drove the agenda and murdered 60 million people. The peaceful majority was irrelevant. Also, in World War II, the majority of Japanese were peaceful, yet the Japanese murdered 12 million people. The peaceful majority was irrelevant.
On Sept. 11, 2011, the U.S. had 2.3 million Muslims – and it took only 19 Muslim terrorists to murder about 3,000 Americans. The peaceful majority was irrelevant. It was reported that the “peaceful majority” cheered at the news.
The peaceful majority of Muslims is not really benign, though. They provide aid and comfort to Muslim terrorists. I wouldn’t advise you to sketch a picture of a person and label it Mohammad and put it in your front yard when you have the “peaceful majority” walking in your neighborhood. To do so may cause your head to separate from your body when a Muslim terrorist happens to drop by your house.
The peaceful majority inform the terrorists in their group and will help terrorists escape. Ever hear of Muslims turning in one of their own due to suspicions of being a terrorist?
All Muslims have the same goal – make everyone Muslim, or dead. To not have this goal would mean they are not Muslim. The book they follow, the Koran, instructs them on this goal. Some Muslims pursue this goal more intensely (terrorists) than others (peaceful majority).
Anyone agreeing to allow Muslims into the U.S.A. is committing treason. Anyone who does not agree to deport all Muslims is committing the same.
Oct 19 2016
ACTUARIAL REVIEW: Analysis of Recent Polls Shows Trump Win and Possible Landslide
Gateway Pundit The mainstream media always use polls to push their agenda. Polls can be skewed by selecting an unreasonable sample size, by asking lead up questions or by selecting more of a sample population of one side of an issue to achieve a desired result. Main stream media skews polls to discourage potential voters from voting and has done it for years.
A good example of the media trying to shape a vote was in 1980. In a Gallup poll released on October 26th in 1980, two weeks before the election, Jimmy Carter was leading Ronald Reagan 47 – 39. Two weeks later Reagan won in such a landslide that Carter conceded before California was closed.
Another example of mainstream liberal media bias was in 1988. A Gallup Poll from July 26 showed Michael S. Dukakis leading George H. W. Bush by 17 points. Of course Bush went on to thump Dukakis in the general election.
This past week a number of polls show Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump by various margins. One poll last week reported by NBC/WSJ showed Hillary ahead by 11. However, Truthfeed pointed out that NBC/WSJ didn’t mention that the poll was created by a Hillary Super PAC.
It’s also well known that the Monmouth University poll is run by a Hillary Huckster who recently was caught manipulating a poll and then lied about it.
Realclearpolitics.com takes an average of these distorted polls to come up with their analysis of the current race. Their efforts are a great example of the phrase – ‘garbage in – garbage out’.
With all the liberal distortions and dishonesty we decided to have a small team of actuarial and statistics professionals take a look at a couple of the recent polls to get their take on the reliability of these polls. They selected the recent FOX poll from October 14 showing Hillary up by 7 and the WSJ/NBC poll from October 16 showing Hillary with an 11 point lead.
The first observation is that both polls are heavily skewed towards Democrats. At a high level, the FOX poll consists of 43 Dems to 36 Reps to 21 Other while the NBC poll shows 44 Dems to 37 Reps to 19 Other. By selecting more Dems the polls are designed to provide a Dem result.
Our experts next analyzed the data and calculated results using the same data from the two surveys on a split of 40 Dems, 40 Reps and 20 Other. The results show that using either sets of data Trump comes out ahead with a larger margin of victory using the FOX data.
Clearly the polls using data that is heavily weighted towards Democrat voters is incorrectly skewed.
This year Republicans crushed their previous record in the primaries for number of votes by 150%. Their old record was 20 million and this year 31 million voted in the primaries.
The Democrats on the other hand had 7 million votes less than their record year in 2008 with 30 million this year compared to 37 million in 2008.
Also, the primaries were heavily contested on both sides resulting in factions from each party vowing not to vote for the party candidate. The impact of these two groups is difficult to judge. The percentage of these voters that change parties is probably limited. If anything, the Sanders people will probably be more likely to vote for Trump since he is an outsider and many of them will never vote for Crooked Hillary.
In the presidential race of Truman vs Dewey, it was so certain that Dewey would win that newspapers printed their morning headline in advance. As we all know, Truman won.
Finally, it is difficult to determine what the independent voters will do but many independent voters partook in the primaries to vote for Trump. Therefore it is more likely that Independent voters vote for Trump as well.
If more Democratic voters vote for Trump than Republicans vote for Hillary and more Independents vote for Trump than Hillary, both scenarios which are highly likely, then the results of the general election will likely be a Trump landslide.
Let’s face it NOBODY likes Hillary and NOBODY trusts Hillary.
Nobody trusted Hillary before WikiLeaks. Trump is filling arenas around the country but Hillary can barely fill half a high school gymnasium. Her VP candidate Tim Kaine can’t even get 50 people at an event.
Maybe the current polls are not just inaccurate – maybe they are dead wrong.
But there’s still a chance the election will be stolen by dirty tricks:
Oct 19 2016
Is this a message to all those ‘deplorables’ supporting Donald Trump? Police are investigating to determine if criminal charges will be filed.
Oct 19 2016
MILO and millions of American patriots are hoping so.
Oct 19 2016
Designated terrorist group CAIR suffering extreme butt-hurt over Donald Trump’s vow to “defeat Islam” and drain the swamp
Notice how Trump’s campaign manager doesn’t qualify the statement by saying “radical.”
As usual, CAIR has disabled comments on this clip.
Oct 19 2016
It would be money well spent as long as they guarantee these Muslim illegals won’t be allowed to come back. The UK Government is giving £2,000 of taxpayers’ cash to illegal aliens to get them to leave the country amid the publishing of new figures which show UK borders are at crisis point.
UK Express (h/t Terry D) Prime Minister Theresa May, who was responsible for immigration until she assumed responsibility for running the country, is facing mounting pressure to bring the situation under control as it’s revealed asylum claims are at their highest level in 12 years. (Even Muslims legally in the UK are a huge drain on social services – below)
Each day immigration officials are forced to deal with queues of thousands of Muslim invaders desperate to secure their welfare status in the country. And to tackle it, the Home Office has confirmed illegal aliens are now being offered £2,000 each to leave as well as a flight home paid for by British taxpayers.
The Government confirmed they have made “assisted return” payments to a total of 529 people since they developed the strategy which was implemented in January of this year. They say the money is offered on a case-by-case basis, up to a maximum value of £2,000 per person. The assistance, the Government says, is to help those returning to “find somewhere to live, find a job or start a business in their home country”.
According to the latest figures there’s been a 41 per cent jump in the amount of asylum claims in the past year with Muslims flooding in from Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Eritrea, Afghanistan and Syria respectively. Home Office officials have confirmed that these figures are the highest since 2004, leaving serious concerns over whether Britain’s policies for dealing with the Europe-wide migrant crisis are working.
Worryingly deportations have dropped by nine per cent as the British Government desperately tries to get a handle on the worsening crisis. Most applications for asylum are made by Muslim illegals already in the country who have made it past border control, the Government has confirmed.
And they say 90% of applications in the year ending June 2016 were claimed after they’d arrived in Britain, rather than immediately on arrival in the UK at a port. In addition there has been a 17% increase in family visas meaning a further 47,000 non-EU nationals immigrated long-term to the UK to accompany or join others after they were granted leave to remain.
An investigation by Express.co.uk revealed the true extent of the problem as civil servants battle to deal with millions of people who have poured into the country in the past decade. Each day thousands of people queue up for appointments at Immigration Centres around the country.
Both illegal aliens and migrants with valid visas are forced to stand in queues for hours at a time, with lines snaking for 300 metres as hundreds of people line the streets to speak to an increasingly slimline enforcement staff. The doors of the detention and processing centre are covered with information which encourages illegals to apply for free flights to their home countries.
Now politicians are warning that the scheme to pay illegal immigrants money will only encourage the problem. UKIP MEP Mike Hookem said the findings were “a kick in the teeth for all the hard working families in this country who are struggling to make ends meet.”
“This money will be on top of the £12billion we send abroad in foreign aid, much of which is unaccounted for and given to corrupt organisations whilst local councils are having to slash services.
“We help criminals set up businesses abroad whilst regulating our own into bankruptcy, we fly people back to their country of origin when people here can’t afford the heating on and we have turned our health service into an international health service.
“During my trips to the Calais ‘Jungle’, I met a number of failed asylum seekers who were looking to re-enter the UK. Schemes like this one do nothing more than to encourage further illegal migration.
“Time and again, Theresa May and the Conservatives have failed to honour their promises on limiting immigration and it seems the situation is set to continue, with deportations falling despite the level of illegal migration being up. “Yet the woman at the helm of this department for years is now running the country. Citizens: beware.”
A Home Office spokesman said: “People who have no right to be in the UK should return to their home country, and it is much better if they do so voluntarily and at the earliest opportunity. Enforced returns cost the taxpayer several thousand pounds, whereas helping those depart voluntarily costs much less.
“Launched in 2016, the Home Office Voluntary Returns Service (VRS) works directly with those who are here illegally and supports them in making arrangements to help them leave the UK of their own volition. This allows us to focus on detaining foreign national offenders and those who represent the biggest threat.”
Oct 19 2016
NO AGE TESTS for obvious adult-aged Muslim migrant ‘children.’ “They look older because war has toughened them up” claims the UK Home Office
This week, bus loads of Muslim so-called ‘child’ migrants arrived from the Calais Jungle after being branded “unaccompanied” minors. However, their ages have been brought into question when migrants who looked like grown men arrived in Croydon, Surrey.
Independent MP David Davies suggested their ages should be checked using radiographs on their teeth – but the British Dental Association said it was “vigorously opposed” to the method of assessment, labelling such a move inappropriate. The British Association of Social Workers joined criticism of David Davies, after the Monmouth MP said “hulking teenagers who look older than 18” should undergo the tests.
But the British people are “sick to death of being taken for an absolute idiot” by the Government after photographs showed the young men, some of whom had visible stubble, boarding a minibus destined for the UK.
Davies said “When I was in the camp in Calais there were caravans with notices on saying ‘Come here, we will coach you in what to say to get into the UK’.” “Someone who is willing to throw themselves on to an electrified rail line, or jump into a moving lorry, isn’t going to be terribly worried about having an X-ray.”
However, The Times reported that, in the year up to September 2015, nearly two thirds of child refugees whose age was questioned by officials were found to be over 18. Of 590 asylum applicants whose age was disputed, 574 were recorded as having an age assessment. Of those, 65 per cent were found to be adults.
UK Daily Mail The second wave of ‘child’ migrants from the Jungle Camp arrived in Britain today with 300 more set to follow in their footsteps in the coming week. Refugees, who the Government claims are aged 14 to 17, arrived at the UK Visas and Immigration office in Croydon, south London, by coach as part of a fast-track system to move youngsters from the French migrant camp before it is demolished.
Some waved to the waiting cameras as they stepped off the packed bus before being escorted into the main building by UK border enforcement officers.
The so-called “youngsters,” from war-torn countries including Syria and Sudan, join the 14 that arrived at the immigration centre yesterday. They are entitled to move to the UK under EU asylum law due to their family ties to those already in the UK – and 300 more are expected to arrive in the coming days.
It comes as critics claim some of the ‘children’ arriving look older than their teenage years, and warned that some adults may be posing as children to abuse the scheme.
After photographs of the refugees arriving were published, Iain McGregor wrote: ‘Does the British Foreign Office think we are stupid? I was expecting kids under the age of 16, not over the age of 21.’
Another added: ‘When I read child migrants I thought it was youngsters. These are young men!!’. And David Moore said: ‘Lie about your age and you get a ride into the land of milk and honey. Don’t think they will be asked for ID at the pub.’
Others commented that some of the ‘children’ had managed to grow facial hair, while Mr Davies questioned why no girls or women had been brought to Britain.
He told The Telegraph: ‘These young men don’t look like minors to me. They are hulking teenagers who look older than 18. I’m all for helping the genuine children but the well of goodwill is rapidly being exhausted here.
‘I’m also curious that there are no young women – I would have thought they would be much more vulnerable. I worry that once again British hospitality is being abused.
‘There is no way of knowing if someone is a child. We could end up causing even more misery if we are not careful. We should invite anyone who wants to come to the UK to take dental tests.’
Officials insist the migrants have undergone rigorous interviews and document checks to establish they are aged under 18. But it has emerged that this is simply a screening process where they are verified as a child based on their ‘physical appearance’ and ‘demeanour’, with social workers signing off an ‘age assessment’.
A Home Office spokesman admitted that routine medical tests, such as checking dental records, have not been carried out because it could be ‘intrusive’.
An aid worker in Calais also raised concerns that adults may be lying about their age to gain entry into Britain. The worker said: ‘It is a complete mess. Those at the front of the queue are not the most needy and vulnerable – they are adults pretending to be children.’
Daniel Gadi, a nine-year-old boy from Eritrea, was also among those still left at the camp. His father Abaye said he wanted his son to be looked after by his late wife’s sister in London, but had not been accepted as he is not an unaccompanied child.
However, a Home Office spokesman said the child migrants may look older because fleeing war zones had ‘probably toughened them up so they’ve grown up a bit quicker’. Officials insist the migrants underwent rigorous interviews and checks on documents they carried to establish they were aged under 18.
Charities estimate up to 10,000 migrants from Africa, the Middle East and Asia have settled in the ‘Jungle’ in the hope of reaching Britain, but French authorities are expected to close it down by the end of the year.
Oct 19 2016
HOT DOGS in Muslim-majority Malaysia set for name change because “dogs” are offensive and considered filthy by Muslims
From the ‘You Can’t Make This Stuff Up’ file, food outlets in Muslim-majority Malaysia must rename hotdogs or risk being refused ‘halal’ certification. The ruling, which also includes other food items whose name includes the word ‘dog’ has garnered much ridicule on social media. “In Islam, dogs are considered unclean (‘haram’) and the name cannot be related to halal certification.”
Breitbart It follows complaints by Muslim tourists from overseas, said Sirajuddin Suhaimee, director of the halal division from the Department of Islamic Development. “Any (halal) products that make consumers confused, we have to change,” he said.
Numerous street vendors and halal restaurants sell hotdogs in Malaysia. Sirajuddin said checks would be made “step-by-step” when these outlets renew their two-year halal certification with the department.
US pretzel chain Aunty Anne’s, which has 45 outlets in Malaysia with plans to expand further, told AFP it has no qualms about renaming its pretzel dogs — sausages wrapped with pretzels — following advice from religious authorities.
Sirajuddin, who recommended pretzel dogs be called pretzel sausages, said Aunty Anne’s halal certification application is currently being considered.
Among the many critics on social media, one Facebook user remarked: “Please stick to religion… don’t be an English language adviser.” Another posted: “Pet shops please rename ur dogs as sausages.” Malaysia has long practised a moderate form of Islam but conservative attitudes are rising.
Oct 19 2016
The billboard which mocks Donald Trump, located along I-94 in ‘Dearbornistan,’ is a virtual ‘NO GO Zone’ for non-Muslims in Michigan. The only people who should be scared are Muslims who could be facing deportation and/or steep declines in immigration under a Trump administration.
FOX2detroit The billboard written in Arabic located along Interstate 94 in Michigan near an Arab-American community is calling Donald Trump “afraid.”
The Detroit Free Press reports (h/t Rob E) the sign translates into English as, “Donald Trump, he can’t read this, but he is afraid of it.” The sign went up last weekend and the Free Press reports it’s funded by the Nuisance Committee super PAC, which was started by the creator of the Cards Against Humanity card game.
Oct 19 2016
Barack Obama’s half brother, Malik Obama, will be in the audience at the third Trump-Clinton debate, cheering on Donald Trump
Malik Obama — an American citizen who lives in Washington, DC, when he’s not in Kenya — says he will be a guest of Trump, the Republican nominee he supports for president.
NY Post (h/t Rob E) “I’m excited to be at the debate. Trump can make America great again,” Malik told The Post. “I look very much forward to meeting and being with Malik,” Trump said. “He gets it far better than his brother.”
Malik also blasted Clinton’s performance as secretary of the State Department for exacerbating the chaos and violence in the Mideast. Malik said ousted Libyan leader Moammar Khadafy had been a good friend. “Check out the situation in Libya now,” he said.
Malik, who is three years older than Barack, said he last saw his sibling in August 2015 after the president had visited Kenya.“I went to the White House to say hello. I paid a courtesy call,” he said. But it wasn’t a very warm and loving reception. “As usual, it was a hands-off kind of thing, very businesslike, very formal,” Malik said.
NY Post Obama, 58, a longtime Democrat, said his “deep disappointment” in his brother Barack’s administration has led him to recently switch allegiance to “the party of Lincoln.”
Oct 18 2016
PART 1: In this explosive new video from Project Veritas Action, a Democratic dirty tricks operative unwittingly provides a dark money trail to the DNC and Clinton campaign. The video documents violence at Trump rallies that is traced to the Clinton campaign and the DNC through a process called birddogging.
A shady coordinated communications chain between the DNC, Clinton Campaign, Hillary Clinton’s Super PAC (Priorities) and other organizations are revealed. A key Clinton operative is on camera saying, “It doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say, we need to win this motherfucker.”
PART 2: In the second video of James O’Keefe’s new explosive series on the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign, Democratic party operatives tell us how to successfully commit voter fraud on a massive scale. Scott Foval, who has since been fired, admits that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years.